CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is more budget-friendly at $1.5/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview holds empirical advantage (3 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
Claude Haiku 4.5Top code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
Claude Haiku 4.5Top logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
Claude Haiku 4.5Fastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Claude Haiku 4.5 (0)Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (3)
Claude Haiku 4.5
0 of 3 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
3 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic cheap/fast Claude SKU. Official Claude Platform list price $1/$5 per 1M tokens (Anthropic Haiku page).

Haiku 4.5Elo 1,438In: $1 · Out: $5/1M
Google
Leads 3 of 3
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $0.25 · Out: $1.5/1M

Claude 4 Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

5 models

Currently comparing Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Opus 4.5$25Claude Opus 4.6$25Claude Sonnet 4.5$15Claude Opus 4.8$25
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude Haiku 4.5
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Wins

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

$1.5 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude Haiku 4.5 (7)vsGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (3)
Claude Haiku 4.5: 7W (70%)Overall: Claude Haiku 4.5Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview: 3W (30%)
← Claude Haiku 4.5Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview →
🏆Claude Haiku 4.5 Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Claude Haiku 4.5vsGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Preference Elo
1,438vs—
Coding Elo
1,446vs—
SWE-bench
58.2%vs—
LiveBench
62.4%vs—
GPQA Diamond
74%vs—
Claude Haiku 4.5: 5WGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview: 0W
🏆Claude Haiku 4.5 Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Claude Haiku 4.5vsGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Output speed
175 tok/svs—
Time to first token
95 msvs—
Claude Haiku 4.5: 2WGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview: 0W
🏆Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Leads(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Claude Haiku 4.5vsGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Output price
$5/1Mvs$1.5/1M+$3.5/1M
Input price
$1/1Mvs$0.25/1M+$0.75/1M
Context window
200kvs1M+849k
Claude Haiku 4.5: 0WGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview: 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Claude Haiku 4.5Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Preference Elo
Claude Haiku 4.51,438
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview—
Coding Elo
Claude Haiku 4.51,446
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview—
LiveBench
Claude Haiku 4.562.4%
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview—
SWE-bench
Claude Haiku 4.558.2%
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview—
GPQA Diamond
Claude Haiku 4.574%
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview—
Time to first token
Claude Haiku 4.595 ms
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview—
Output speed
Claude Haiku 4.5175 tok/s
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview—
Input priceGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview +$0.75/1M
Claude Haiku 4.5$1/1M
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.25/1M
Output priceGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview +$3.5/1M
Claude Haiku 4.5$5/1M
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$1.5/1M
Context windowGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview +849k
Claude Haiku 4.5200k
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview1M
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,438
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
——
Coding Elo
1,446
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
——
LiveBench
62.4%
livebench · Aug 16, 2026
——
SWE-bench
58.2%
swebench · Aug 16, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
74%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
——
Time to first token
95 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
——
Output speed
175 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
——
Input price
$1/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.25/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$0.75/1M
Output price
$5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$1.5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$3.5/1M
Context window
200k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+849k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 72% with Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Haiku 4.5$110.00 / mo
In: $35Out: $75
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$31.25 / mo
In: $8.75Out: $22.5
Estimated Cost Delta

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is estimated to save $78.75/month ($945/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview:Pick Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview:Pick Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Lower output list price ($1.5/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLower output list price ($1.5/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Haiku 4.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 16, 2026

Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

$1/$5 hosted Claude vs a cheap long-context open sibling. The alternative-to-Sonnet pair that is honest.

launchApr 8, 2026

Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

Huge window, cheap hosted lists. The Haiku alternative that is actually open-weight.

launchOct 22, 2025

Claude Haiku 4.5 at $1/$5: the cheap Claude people actually ship

Official Anthropic list $1/$5. This is the SKU behind “cheapest Claude alternative” that is still Claude.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-haiku-4-5-vs-gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

Elo 1,438
SWE-bench58.2%
Speed (tok/s)175 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$1/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$5/1M
Google

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)1M
Input / 1M Tokens$0.25/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1.5/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview output tokens are $1.5/1M versus $5/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview accepts 1M tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Haiku 4.5 and Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 16, 2026

    Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

  • launch · Apr 8, 2026

    Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

  • launch · Oct 22, 2025

    Claude Haiku 4.5 at $1/$5: the cheap Claude people actually ship

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Haiku 4.5 matchups →|All Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview matchups →
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude 3.5 Haiku (previous haiku)Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5