CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Grok 3

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Grok 3 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) is more budget-friendly at $2.5/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) and Grok 3 present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) holds empirical advantage (3 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
Grok 3Top code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
Grok 3Top logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)Lowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
Grok 3Fastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) (3)Grok 3 (0)
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)
3 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
Grok 3
0 of 3 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Anthropic
Leads 3 of 3
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5:batch). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $0.5 · Out: $2.5/1M
xAI
Grok 3

Previous xAI generation before Grok 4. Kept for grok 3 vs grok 4.

Elo 1,405In: $3 · Out: $15/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderAnthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) Wins

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)

$2.5 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) (3)vsGrok 3 (6)
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch): 3W (33%)Overall: Grok 3Grok 3: 6W (67%)
← Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)Grok 3 →
🏆Grok 3 Leads(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)vsGrok 3
Preference Elo
—vs1,405
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
—vs51.4%
LiveBench
—vs60.2%
GPQA Diamond
—vs74.2%
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch): 0WGrok 3: 4W
🏆Grok 3 Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)vsGrok 3
Output speed
—vs88 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs250 ms
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch): 0WGrok 3: 2W
🏆Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) Leads(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)vsGrok 3
Output price
$2.5/1Mvs$15/1M+$12.5/1M
Input price
$0.5/1Mvs$3/1M+$2.5/1M
Context window
200kvs131k+69k
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch): 3WGrok 3: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)Grok 3
Preference Elo
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)—
Grok 31,405
LiveBench
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)—
Grok 360.2%
SWE-bench
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)—
Grok 351.4%
GPQA Diamond
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)—
Grok 374.2%
Time to first token
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)—
Grok 3250 ms
Output speed
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)—
Grok 388 tok/s
Input priceAnthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) +$2.5/1M
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)$0.5/1M
Grok 3$3/1M
Output priceAnthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) +$12.5/1M
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)$2.5/1M
Grok 3$15/1M
Context windowAnthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) +69k
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)200k
Grok 3131k
BenchmarkAnthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)Grok 3Advantage Delta
Preference Elo—
1,405
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
LiveBench—
60.2%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
SWE-bench—
51.4%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
GPQA Diamond—
74.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Time to first token—
250 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Output speed—
88 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Input price
$0.5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$2.5/1M
Output price
$2.5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$12.5/1M
Context window
200k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
131k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+69k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 83% with Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)$55.00 / mo
In: $17.5Out: $37.5
Grok 3$330.00 / mo
In: $105Out: $225
Estimated Cost Delta

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) is estimated to save $275.00/month ($3,300/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch):Pick Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatAnthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)

Lower output list price ($2.5/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGAnthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)

Larger window (200k).

Screenshots / visionGrok 3

Grok 3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatAnthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)Lower output list price ($2.5/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGAnthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)Larger window (200k).
Screenshots / visionGrok 3Grok 3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-haiku-4-5-batch-vs-grok-3/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)200k
Input / 1M Tokens$0.5/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$2.5/1M
xAI

Grok 3

Elo 1,405
SWE-bench51.4%
Speed (tok/s)88 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$15/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) or Grok 3?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) or Grok 3?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) output tokens are $2.5/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) or Grok 3?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) accepts 200k tokens versus 131k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) and Grok 3 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) matchups →|All Grok 3 matchups →
Grok 3 vs Grok 4 (next grok)Claude Opus 4.5 vs Grok 3Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok 3Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Grok 3Grok 4.6 vs Grok 3Claude Opus 5 vs Grok 3