Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)
In this head-to-head showdown, Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) is more budget-friendly at $2.5/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5:batch). Preview until a second source matches.
Anthropic current default flagship. Official API $5/$25 per 1M tokens and a 1M context window (Anthropic, Jul 24 2026).
Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost
Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.
Single model data
No latency data
$2.5 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) | Claude Opus 5 | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | — | — | |
| Coding Elo | — | — | |
| LiveBench | — | — | |
| SWE-bench | — | — | |
| GPQA Diamond | — | — | |
| Time to first token | — | — | |
| Output speed | — | 72 tok/s | — |
| Input price | $0.5/1M | +$9.5/1M | |
| Output price | $2.5/1M | +$47.5/1M | |
| Context window | +800k |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) is estimated to save $1,045.00/month ($12,540/year).
Need SWE-bench on both sides.
Lower output list price ($2.5/1M).
Need TTFT on both sides.
Larger window (1M).
Claude Opus 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | insufficient data | Need SWE-bench on both sides. |
| High-volume chat | Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) | Lower output list price ($2.5/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | insufficient data | Need TTFT on both sides. |
| Long-document RAG | Claude Opus 5 | Larger window (1M). |
| Screenshots / vision | Claude Opus 5 | Claude Opus 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
Usually Sonnet 5 vs Opus 5. Coding delta versus output $/1M. The workhorse question.
Top Anthropic vs top Google. Usually Opus 5 vs 3.6 Pro. Two different invoices.
Not a frozen 2025 article. Today that is usually Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol. Dated cells, not a brand fight.
Jul 24 2026 official API at $5/$25 and a 1M window. Preference Elo is taste, not a coding exam.
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-haiku-4-5-batch-vs-claude-opus-5/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry
compare · Aug 10, 2026
Sonnet vs Opus in 2026: same family, different invoice
compare · Jul 24, 2026
Claude vs Gemini: coding, Elo, and output price — not a brand mashup
compare · Jul 24, 2026
Claude vs GPT benchmark: this hub always remaps to the current Elo leaders
launch · Jul 24, 2026
Claude Opus 5 is Anthropic’s default flagship — how to read it on CompareLLM
