CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Doubao Lite 1.5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Doubao Lite 1.5 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Doubao Lite 1.5 is more budget-friendly at $0.1/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Doubao Lite 1.5 if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Doubao Lite 1.5 holds empirical advantage (2 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
Doubao Lite 1.5Top code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
Doubao Lite 1.5Top logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Doubao Lite 1.5Lowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
Doubao Lite 1.5Fastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest (1)Doubao Lite 1.5 (2)
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest
1 of 3 Wins
✓Context window
Doubao Lite 1.5
2 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price
~anthropic
Leads 1 of 3
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (~anthropic/claude-fable-latest). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $10 · Out: $50/1M
ByteDance
Leads 2 of 3
Doubao Lite 1.5

ByteDance high-speed lightweight model priced at sub-cent levels.

Lite 1.5Elo 1,360In: $0.04 · Out: $0.1/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderDoubao Lite 1.5 Wins

Doubao Lite 1.5

$0.1 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest (1)vsDoubao Lite 1.5 (9)
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest: 1W (10%)Overall: Doubao Lite 1.5Doubao Lite 1.5: 9W (90%)
← Anthropic: Claude Fable LatestDoubao Lite 1.5 →
🏆Doubao Lite 1.5 Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Anthropic: Claude Fable LatestvsDoubao Lite 1.5
Preference Elo
—vs1,360
Coding Elo
—vs1,320
SWE-bench
—vs46%
LiveBench
—vs54%
GPQA Diamond
—vs64.2%
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest: 0WDoubao Lite 1.5: 5W
🏆Doubao Lite 1.5 Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Anthropic: Claude Fable LatestvsDoubao Lite 1.5
Output speed
—vs180 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs110 ms
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest: 0WDoubao Lite 1.5: 2W
🏆Doubao Lite 1.5 Leads(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Anthropic: Claude Fable LatestvsDoubao Lite 1.5
Output price
$50/1Mvs$0.1/1M+$49.9/1M
Input price
$10/1Mvs$0.04/1M+$9.96/1M
Context window
1Mvs33k+967k
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest: 1WDoubao Lite 1.5: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Anthropic: Claude Fable LatestDoubao Lite 1.5
Preference Elo
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest—
Doubao Lite 1.51,360
Coding Elo
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest—
Doubao Lite 1.51,320
LiveBench
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest—
Doubao Lite 1.554%
SWE-bench
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest—
Doubao Lite 1.546%
GPQA Diamond
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest—
Doubao Lite 1.564.2%
Time to first token
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest—
Doubao Lite 1.5110 ms
Output speed
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest—
Doubao Lite 1.5180 tok/s
Input priceDoubao Lite 1.5 +$9.96/1M
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest$10/1M
Doubao Lite 1.5$0.04/1M
Output priceDoubao Lite 1.5 +$49.9/1M
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest$50/1M
Doubao Lite 1.5$0.1/1M
Context windowAnthropic: Claude Fable Latest +967k
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest1M
Doubao Lite 1.533k
BenchmarkAnthropic: Claude Fable LatestDoubao Lite 1.5Advantage Delta
Preference Elo—
1,360
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
Coding Elo—
1,320
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
LiveBench—
54%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
SWE-bench—
46%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
GPQA Diamond—
64.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Time to first token—
110 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Output speed—
180 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Input price
$10/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.04/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$9.96/1M
Output price
$50/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$49.9/1M
Context window
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
33k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+967k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 100% with Doubao Lite 1.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest$1,100.00 / mo
In: $350Out: $750
Doubao Lite 1.5$2.90 / mo
In: $1.4Out: $1.5
Estimated Cost Delta

Doubao Lite 1.5 is estimated to save $1,097.10/month ($13,165/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Doubao Lite 1.5:Pick Doubao Lite 1.5 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest:Pick Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatDoubao Lite 1.5

Lower output list price ($0.1/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGAnthropic: Claude Fable Latest

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionDoubao Lite 1.5

Doubao Lite 1.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatDoubao Lite 1.5Lower output list price ($0.1/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGAnthropic: Claude Fable LatestLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionDoubao Lite 1.5Doubao Lite 1.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-fable-latest-vs-doubao-1-5-lite/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
~anthropic

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)1M
Input / 1M Tokens$10/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$50/1M
ByteDance

Doubao Lite 1.5

Elo 1,360
SWE-bench46%
Speed (tok/s)180 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.04/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.1/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Doubao Lite 1.5?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Doubao Lite 1.5?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Doubao Lite 1.5 output tokens are $0.1/1M versus $50/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Doubao Lite 1.5?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest accepts 1M tokens versus 33k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest and Doubao Lite 1.5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest matchups →|All Doubao Lite 1.5 matchups →
Doubao Lite 1.5 vs Doubao Pro 1.5 (next seed)Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Doubao Lite 1.5Claude Opus 4.5 vs Doubao Lite 1.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Doubao Lite 1.5Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Doubao Lite 1.5GPT-5 vs Doubao Lite 1.5