Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Claude Fable 5 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,616 vs 1,490), while Claude Fable 5 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (80%), while Claude Fable 5 is more budget-friendly at $50/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
Anthropic top-tier X-High reasoning model engineered for heavy multi-step tasks. Official API $10/$50 per 1M tokens (Claude Platform pricing, Aug 2026).
First Claude 4 Opus generation. Baseline for opus 4 vs opus 5.
Currently comparing Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4. Alternative family tiers available.
Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost
Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.
Δ 126 Arena Elo pts
58 tok/s
$50 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Claude Opus 4 | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +126 | ||
| Coding Elo | +120 | ||
| LiveBench | +8.4% | ||
| SWE-bench | +7.5% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +7.2% | ||
| Time to first token | +50 ms | ||
| Output speed | 58 tok/s | 58 tok/s | — |
| Input price | +$5/1M | ||
| Output price | +$25/1M | ||
| Context window | +800k |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Claude Fable 5 is estimated to save $550.00/month ($6,600/year).
Higher SWE-bench (80%).
Lower output list price ($50/1M).
Lower TTFT (340 ms).
Larger window (1M).
Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Fable 5).
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Claude Fable 5 | Higher SWE-bench (80%). |
| High-volume chat | Claude Fable 5 | Lower output list price ($50/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Claude Fable 5 | Lower TTFT (340 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Claude Fable 5 | Larger window (1M). |
| Screenshots / vision | Claude Fable 5 | Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Fable 5). |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-fable-5-vs-claude-opus-4/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry