CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) vs GPT-4o mini

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) vs GPT-4o mini benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, GPT-4o mini is more budget-friendly at $0.6/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose GPT-4o mini if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

GPT-4o mini holds empirical advantage (2 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
GPT-4o miniTop code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
GPT-4o miniTop logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
GPT-4o miniLowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
GPT-4o miniFastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) (1)GPT-4o mini (2)
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)
1 of 3 Wins
✓Context window
GPT-4o mini
2 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price
Anthropic
Leads 1 of 3
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (anthropic/claude-fable-5:batch). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $5 · Out: $25/1M
OpenAI
Leads 2 of 3
GPT-4o mini

Legacy small OpenAI model. Useful as a cheap baseline.

4o MiniElo 1,272In: $0.15 · Out: $0.6/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderGPT-4o mini Wins

GPT-4o mini

$0.6 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) (1)vsGPT-4o mini (8)
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch): 1W (11%)Overall: GPT-4o miniGPT-4o mini: 8W (89%)
← Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)GPT-4o mini →
🏆GPT-4o mini Leads(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)vsGPT-4o mini
Preference Elo
—vs1,272
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
—vs41.2%
LiveBench
—vs48.1%
GPQA Diamond
—vs60.1%
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch): 0WGPT-4o mini: 4W
🏆GPT-4o mini Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)vsGPT-4o mini
Output speed
—vs160 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs130 ms
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch): 0WGPT-4o mini: 2W
🏆GPT-4o mini Leads(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)vsGPT-4o mini
Output price
$25/1Mvs$0.6/1M+$24.4/1M
Input price
$5/1Mvs$0.15/1M+$4.85/1M
Context window
1Mvs128k+872k
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch): 1WGPT-4o mini: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)GPT-4o mini
Preference Elo
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)—
GPT-4o mini1,272
LiveBench
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)—
GPT-4o mini48.1%
SWE-bench
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)—
GPT-4o mini41.2%
GPQA Diamond
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)—
GPT-4o mini60.1%
Time to first token
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)—
GPT-4o mini130 ms
Output speed
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)—
GPT-4o mini160 tok/s
Input priceGPT-4o mini +$4.85/1M
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)$5/1M
GPT-4o mini$0.15/1M
Output priceGPT-4o mini +$24.4/1M
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)$25/1M
GPT-4o mini$0.6/1M
Context windowAnthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) +872k
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)1M
GPT-4o mini128k
BenchmarkAnthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)GPT-4o miniAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo—
1,272
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
LiveBench—
48.1%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
SWE-bench—
41.2%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
GPQA Diamond—
60.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Time to first token—
130 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Output speed—
160 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Input price
$5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$4.85/1M
Output price
$25/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.6/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$24.4/1M
Context window
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
128k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+872k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 97% with GPT-4o mini
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)$550.00 / mo
In: $175Out: $375
GPT-4o mini$14.25 / mo
In: $5.25Out: $9
Estimated Cost Delta

GPT-4o mini is estimated to save $535.75/month ($6,429/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    GPT-4o mini:Pick GPT-4o mini when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch):Pick Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatGPT-4o mini

Lower output list price ($0.6/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGAnthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGPT-4o mini

GPT-4o mini is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatGPT-4o miniLower output list price ($0.6/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGAnthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionGPT-4o miniGPT-4o mini is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-fable-5-batch-vs-gpt-4o-mini/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)1M
Input / 1M Tokens$5/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$25/1M
OpenAI

GPT-4o mini

Elo 1,272
SWE-bench41.2%
Speed (tok/s)160 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.15/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.6/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) or GPT-4o mini?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) or GPT-4o mini?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
GPT-4o mini output tokens are $0.6/1M versus $25/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) or GPT-4o mini?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) accepts 1M tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) and GPT-4o mini Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) matchups →|All GPT-4o mini matchups →
GPT-4o mini vs OpenAI o1-mini (next gpt-mini)Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-4o miniClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-4o miniClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-4o miniGPT-5 vs GPT-4o miniGPT-4.5 Orion vs GPT-4o mini