CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) vs GPT-4 Turbo

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) vs GPT-4 Turbo benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) is more budget-friendly at $25/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) and GPT-4 Turbo present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

3 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) (3)GPT-4 Turbo (0)
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)
3 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
GPT-4 Turbo
0 of 3 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Anthropic
Leads 3 of 3 metrics
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (anthropic/claude-fable-5:batch). Preview until a second source matches.

$25/1M out
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo

GPT-4 Turbo 128k. Historical flagship for gpt-4 turbo vs gpt-4o / gpt-5.

Elo 1,255$30/1M out
Top Rival Showdowns for Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderAnthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) Wins

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)

$25 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) (3)vsGPT-4 Turbo (6)
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch): 3W (33%)Overall: GPT-4 TurboGPT-4 Turbo: 6W (67%)
← Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)GPT-4 Turbo →
🏆GPT-4 Turbo(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)vsGPT-4 Turbo
Preference Elo
—vs1,255
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
—vs33.2%
LiveBench
—vs47%
GPQA Diamond
—vs48%
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch): 0WGPT-4 Turbo: 4W
🏆GPT-4 Turbo(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)vsGPT-4 Turbo
Output speed
—vs55 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs350 ms
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch): 0WGPT-4 Turbo: 2W
🏆Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)vsGPT-4 Turbo
Output price
$25/1Mvs$30/1M+$5/1M
Input price
$5/1Mvs$10/1M+$5/1M
Context window
1Mvs128k+872k
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch): 3WGPT-4 Turbo: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)—
GPT-4 Turbo1,255
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
LiveBench
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)—
GPT-4 Turbo47%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
SWE-bench
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)—
GPT-4 Turbo33.2%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
GPQA Diamond
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)—
GPT-4 Turbo48%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)—
GPT-4 Turbo350 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)—
GPT-4 Turbo55 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$5/1M
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)$5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
GPT-4 Turbo$10/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Output price+$5/1M
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)$25/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
GPT-4 Turbo$30/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Context window+872k
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
GPT-4 Turbo128k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
BenchmarkAnthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)GPT-4 TurboAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo—
1,255
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
LiveBench—
47%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
SWE-bench—
33.2%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
GPQA Diamond—
48%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Time to first token—
350 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Output speed—
55 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Input price
$5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$10/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$5/1M
Output price
$25/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$30/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$5/1M
Context window
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
128k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+872k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 31% with Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)$550.00 / mo
In: $175Out: $375
GPT-4 Turbo$800.00 / mo
In: $350Out: $450
Estimated Cost Delta

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) is estimated to save $250.00/month ($3,000/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch):Pick Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch):Pick Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatAnthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)

Lower output list price ($25/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGAnthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGPT-4 Turbo

GPT-4 Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatAnthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)Lower output list price ($25/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGAnthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionGPT-4 TurboGPT-4 Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-fable-5-batch-vs-gpt-4-turbo/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch)

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)1M
Input / 1M Tokens$5/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$25/1M
OpenAI

GPT-4 Turbo

Elo 1,255
SWE-bench33.2%
Speed (tok/s)55 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$10/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$30/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) or GPT-4 Turbo?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) or GPT-4 Turbo?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) output tokens are $25/1M versus $30/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) or GPT-4 Turbo?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) accepts 1M tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) and GPT-4 Turbo Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 (batch) matchups →|All GPT-4 Turbo matchups →
GPT-4 Turbo vs GPT-4o (next gpt-flagship)Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-4 TurboClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-4 TurboClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-4 TurboGPT-5 vs GPT-4 TurboGPT-4.5 Orion vs GPT-4 Turbo