CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Relace: Relace Search

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Relace: Relace Search benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Relace: Relace Search is more budget-friendly at $3/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Relace: Relace Search if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Relace: Relace Search holds empirical advantage (3 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
Claude 3.5 SonnetTop code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
Claude 3.5 SonnetTop logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Relace: Relace SearchLowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
Claude 3.5 SonnetFastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (0)Relace: Relace Search (3)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
0 of 3 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Relace: Relace Search
3 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet

2024 workhorse. Still a high-intent compare against GPT-4o.

Elo 1,280In: $3 · Out: $15/1M
relace
Leads 3 of 3
Relace: Relace Search

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (relace/relace-search). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $1 · Out: $3/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude 3.5 Sonnet
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderRelace: Relace Search Wins

Relace: Relace Search

$3 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (6)vsRelace: Relace Search (3)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 6W (67%)Overall: Claude 3.5 SonnetRelace: Relace Search: 3W (33%)
← Claude 3.5 SonnetRelace: Relace Search →
🏆Claude 3.5 Sonnet Leads(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Claude 3.5 SonnetvsRelace: Relace Search
Preference Elo
1,280vs—
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
49%vs—
LiveBench
52.1%vs—
GPQA Diamond
65%vs—
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 4WRelace: Relace Search: 0W
🏆Claude 3.5 Sonnet Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Claude 3.5 SonnetvsRelace: Relace Search
Output speed
80 tok/svs—
Time to first token
280 msvs—
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 2WRelace: Relace Search: 0W
🏆Relace: Relace Search Leads(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Claude 3.5 SonnetvsRelace: Relace Search
Output price
$15/1Mvs$3/1M+$12/1M
Input price
$3/1Mvs$1/1M+$2/1M
Context window
200kvs256k+56k
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 0WRelace: Relace Search: 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Claude 3.5 SonnetRelace: Relace Search
Preference Elo
Claude 3.5 Sonnet1,280
Relace: Relace Search—
LiveBench
Claude 3.5 Sonnet52.1%
Relace: Relace Search—
SWE-bench
Claude 3.5 Sonnet49%
Relace: Relace Search—
GPQA Diamond
Claude 3.5 Sonnet65%
Relace: Relace Search—
Time to first token
Claude 3.5 Sonnet280 ms
Relace: Relace Search—
Output speed
Claude 3.5 Sonnet80 tok/s
Relace: Relace Search—
Input priceRelace: Relace Search +$2/1M
Claude 3.5 Sonnet$3/1M
Relace: Relace Search$1/1M
Output priceRelace: Relace Search +$12/1M
Claude 3.5 Sonnet$15/1M
Relace: Relace Search$3/1M
Context windowRelace: Relace Search +56k
Claude 3.5 Sonnet200k
Relace: Relace Search256k
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetRelace: Relace SearchAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,280
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
LiveBench
52.1%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
SWE-bench
49%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
65%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Time to first token
280 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Output speed
80 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Input price
$3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$1/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$2/1M
Output price
$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$3/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$12/1M
Context window
200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
256k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+56k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 76% with Relace: Relace Search
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet$330.00 / mo
In: $105Out: $225
Relace: Relace Search$80.00 / mo
In: $35Out: $45
Estimated Cost Delta

Relace: Relace Search is estimated to save $250.00/month ($3,000/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Relace: Relace Search:Pick Relace: Relace Search when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatRelace: Relace Search

Lower output list price ($3/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGRelace: Relace Search

Larger window (256k).

Screenshots / visionClaude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatRelace: Relace SearchLower output list price ($3/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGRelace: Relace SearchLarger window (256k).
Screenshots / visionClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude 3.5 Sonnet is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-3-5-sonnet-vs-relace-search/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Elo 1,280
SWE-bench49%
Speed (tok/s)80 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$15/1M
relace

Relace: Relace Search

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)256k
Input / 1M Tokens$1/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$3/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Relace: Relace Search?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Relace: Relace Search?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Relace: Relace Search output tokens are $3/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Relace: Relace Search?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Relace: Relace Search accepts 256k tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Relace: Relace Search Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude 3.5 Sonnet matchups →|All Relace: Relace Search matchups →
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet (next sonnet)Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude 3.5 SonnetClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude 3.5 SonnetClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude 3.5 SonnetClaude Opus 5 vs Claude 3.5 SonnetClaude Fable 5 vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet