CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is more budget-friendly at $2.3/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 holds empirical advantage (3 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
Claude 3.5 HaikuTop code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
Claude 3.5 HaikuTop logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Lowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
Claude 3.5 HaikuFastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Claude 3.5 Haiku (0)Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 (3)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
0 of 3 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
3 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku

Previous cheap Claude. Haiku 4.5 is the current $1/$5 SKU.

Elo 1,224In: $0.8 · Out: $4/1M
Alibaba
Leads 3 of 3
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $0.23 · Out: $2.3/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude 3.5 Haiku
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 Wins

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

$2.3 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude 3.5 Haiku (6)vsQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 (3)
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 6W (67%)Overall: Claude 3.5 HaikuQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 3W (33%)
← Claude 3.5 HaikuQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 →
🏆Claude 3.5 Haiku Leads(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Claude 3.5 HaikuvsQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Preference Elo
1,224vs—
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
36.2%vs—
LiveBench
44.8%vs—
GPQA Diamond
54.1%vs—
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 4WQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 0W
🏆Claude 3.5 Haiku Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Claude 3.5 HaikuvsQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Output speed
140 tok/svs—
Time to first token
110 msvs—
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 2WQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 0W
🏆Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 Leads(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Claude 3.5 HaikuvsQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Output price
$4/1Mvs$2.3/1M+$1.7/1M
Input price
$0.8/1Mvs$0.23/1M+$0.57/1M
Context window
200kvs262k+62k
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 0WQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Claude 3.5 HaikuQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Preference Elo
Claude 3.5 Haiku1,224
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507—
LiveBench
Claude 3.5 Haiku44.8%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507—
SWE-bench
Claude 3.5 Haiku36.2%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507—
GPQA Diamond
Claude 3.5 Haiku54.1%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507—
Time to first token
Claude 3.5 Haiku110 ms
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507—
Output speed
Claude 3.5 Haiku140 tok/s
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507—
Input priceQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 +$0.57/1M
Claude 3.5 Haiku$0.8/1M
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.23/1M
Output priceQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 +$1.7/1M
Claude 3.5 Haiku$4/1M
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$2.3/1M
Context windowQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 +62k
Claude 3.5 Haiku200k
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507262k
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,224
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
LiveBench
44.8%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
SWE-bench
36.2%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
54.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Time to first token
110 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Output speed
140 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Input price
$0.8/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.23/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$0.57/1M
Output price
$4/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$2.3/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$1.7/1M
Context window
200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
262k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+62k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 52% with Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude 3.5 Haiku$88.00 / mo
In: $28Out: $60
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$42.55 / mo
In: $8.05Out: $34.5
Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is estimated to save $45.45/month ($545/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507:Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Lower output list price ($2.3/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Larger window (262k).

Screenshots / visionClaude 3.5 Haiku

Claude 3.5 Haiku is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Lower output list price ($2.3/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Larger window (262k).
Screenshots / visionClaude 3.5 HaikuClaude 3.5 Haiku is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-3-5-haiku-vs-qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Elo 1,224
SWE-bench36.2%
Speed (tok/s)140 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.8/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$4/1M
Alibaba

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)262k
Input / 1M Tokens$0.23/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$2.3/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 output tokens are $2.3/1M versus $4/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 accepts 262k tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude 3.5 Haiku matchups →|All Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 matchups →
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Claude Haiku 4.5 (next haiku)Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude 3.5 HaikuClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude 3.5 HaikuClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude 3.5 HaikuQwen 3 Max vs Claude 3.5 HaikuClaude Opus 5 vs Claude 3.5 Haiku