CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Claude Opus 4.6: the May follow-on that still shows up in old bookmarks
Claude Opus 4.6: the May follow-on that still shows up in old bookmarks
launchVerified Dispatch
CompareLLM Intelligence Desk·May 10, 2026

Claude Opus 4.6: the May follow-on that still shows up in old bookmarks

Slightly behind 4.5 on one official SWE-bench sweep; stronger long-horizon traces. We keep the row for old vs URLs.

Search intent: claude opus 4.6 benchmark

Evaluated Models (6):
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic
Claude Opus 4Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic
Claude Opus 5Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic
Claude 3 OpusAnthropic
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit
Verified Benchmark Scorecard6 Models Evaluated

Claude Opus 4.6 & Frontier Peer Benchmark Comparison

Live benchmark scores, throughput speeds, and token pricing with dynamic peer comparison.

LMSYS Arena Elo1,574Claude Opus 4.6
SWE-bench Verified75.9%Coding resolve %
Throughput Speed64 tok/sGeneration rate
Output Price / 1M$75.00List rate
Interactive Model Comparison:6 models selected
Claude Opus 4.6ArticleClaude Opus 4ArticleClaude Opus 4.5ArticleClaude Opus 5ArticleClaude Opus 4.8ArticleClaude 3 OpusArticle
LMSYS Arena EloOverall human preference
quality
Claude Opus 4.6
1,574
Claude Opus 4
1,490
Claude Opus 4.5
1,568
Claude Opus 5Best
1,624
Claude Opus 4.8
1,598
Claude 3 Opus
1,248
Coding EloProgramming preference
quality
Claude Opus 4.6
1,570
Claude Opus 4
1,502
Claude Opus 4.5
1,574
Claude Opus 5Best
1,618
Claude Opus 4.8
1,604
Claude 3 Opus
—
SWE-bench VerifiedGitHub issue resolve %
quality
Claude Opus 4.6
75.9%
Claude Opus 4
72.5%
Claude Opus 4.5
76.8%
Claude Opus 5Best
79.2%
Claude Opus 4.8
78.4%
Claude 3 Opus
38.4%
GPQA DiamondPhD-level science reasoning %
quality
Claude Opus 4.6
84.8%
Claude Opus 4
80.4%
Claude Opus 4.5
84.1%
Claude Opus 5Best
87.1%
Claude Opus 4.8
86.2%
Claude 3 Opus
50.4%
LiveBenchContamination-free reasoning
quality
Claude Opus 4.6
72%
Claude Opus 4
66.8%
Claude Opus 4.5
71.2%
Claude Opus 5Best
74.8%
Claude Opus 4.8
73.6%
Claude 3 Opus
46.2%
Throughput (Speed)Output tokens / second
speed
Claude Opus 4.6
64 tok/s
Claude Opus 4
58 tok/s
Claude Opus 4.5
62 tok/s
Claude Opus 5Best
72 tok/s
Claude Opus 4.8
66 tok/s
Claude 3 Opus
48 tok/s
Time-to-First-TokenInitial latency (ms)
speed
Claude Opus 4.6
360 ms
Claude Opus 4
390 ms
Claude Opus 4.5
380 ms
Claude Opus 5Best
310 ms
Claude Opus 4.8
330 ms
Claude 3 Opus
420 ms
Output Token Price$ per 1M reply tokens
price
Claude Opus 4.6
$75/1M
Claude Opus 4
$75/1M
Claude Opus 4.5
$75/1M
Claude Opus 5Best
$25/1M
Claude Opus 4.8
$25/1M
Claude 3 Opus
$75/1M
Input Token Price$ per 1M prompt tokens
price
Claude Opus 4.6
$15/1M
Claude Opus 4
$15/1M
Claude Opus 4.5
$15/1M
Claude Opus 5Best
$5/1M
Claude Opus 4.8
$5/1M
Claude 3 Opus
$15/1M
Context WindowMax token capacity
capacity
Claude Opus 4.6
200k
Claude Opus 4
200k
Claude Opus 4.5
200k
Claude Opus 5Best
1M
Claude Opus 4.8
1M
Claude 3 Opus
200k
Benchmark / Metric
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic · Article Model
Claude Opus 4Anthropic · Article Model
Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic · Article Model
Claude Opus 5Anthropic · Article Model
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic · Article Model
Claude 3 OpusAnthropic · Article Model
LMSYS Arena EloOverall human preference
1,574
1,490
1,568
1,624Top
1,598
1,248
Coding EloProgramming preference
1,570
1,502
1,574
1,618Top
1,604
—
SWE-bench VerifiedGitHub issue resolve %
75.9%
72.5%
76.8%
79.2%Top
78.4%
38.4%
GPQA DiamondPhD-level science reasoning %
84.8%
80.4%
84.1%
87.1%Top
86.2%
50.4%
LiveBenchContamination-free reasoning
72%
66.8%
71.2%
74.8%Top
73.6%
46.2%
Throughput (Speed)Output tokens / second
64 tok/s
58 tok/s
62 tok/s
72 tok/sTop
66 tok/s
48 tok/s
Time-to-First-TokenInitial latency (ms)
360 ms
390 ms
380 ms
310 msTop
330 ms
420 ms
Output Token Price$ per 1M reply tokens
$75/1M
$75/1M
$75/1M
$25/1MTop
$25/1M
$75/1M
Input Token Price$ per 1M prompt tokens
$15/1M
$15/1M
$15/1M
$5/1MTop
$5/1M
$15/1M
Context WindowMax token capacity
200k
200k
200k
1MTop
1M
200k
Executive Key Takeaway
Slightly behind 4.5 on one official SWE-bench sweep; stronger long-horizon traces. We keep the row for old vs URLs.

Opus 4.6 shipped as a follow-on, not a rename. Our seed notes it slightly behind 4.5 on the last published bash-only SWE-bench sweep and stronger on long-horizon traces. That is a snapshot, not a personality test. If your bookmark still says 4.6, the model page will tell you whether ingest moved the cells.

Follow-ons confuse aliases

OpenRouter ids and Arena names drift. 4.6 has aliases so daily ingest does not create a second preview row. If you see “needs alias” in changelog, attach the leftover name in /admin — do not invent a new slug.

Empirical Evaluation & Architectural Analysis

Empirical evaluations recorded across the CompareLLM Leaderboard highlight how parameter scaling and inference optimization impact production throughput and cost-per-token economics. Reference the interactive scorecard above for verified snapshots or inspect the dedicated claude-opus-4-6 dossier.

Read 4.6 against 4.5, not against Sol

Same family, same list class. Cross-lab compares belong on 5 vs Sol. Intra-family belongs on 4.5 vs 4.6.

Strategic Deployment Recommendation

  • Production Workloads: For enterprise workloads requiring strict reliability, cross-reference Top Coding LLMs and Cheapest High-Quality LLMs.
  • Direct Pair Comparison: Check model specifications at claude-opus-4-6 specs.
  • Architectural Stacks: Recommended architectural configurations can be evaluated on the CompareLLM Stack Engine.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this an CompareLLM lab test score? No. Linked model dossiers and compare showdowns reflect dated snapshots gathered from named public evaluation benchmarks. Seed catalog entries remain transparently timestamped until daily ingest updates them.

Where can I see live comparisons for this model? Explore verified model specs at claude-opus-4-6.

What primary search query does this briefing answer? claude opus 4.6 benchmark.

Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Head-to-Head Showdowns for Mentioned Models

Featured Article ShowdownClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4
Compare Benchmarks
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5 mini
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 4 vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 4 vs GPT-5 mini
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5 mini
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 5 vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 5 vs GPT-5 mini
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5 mini
Benchmark MatchupClaude 3 Opus vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude 3 Opus vs GPT-5 mini

Related news

  • launch · Jun 20, 2026

    Keep Opus 4.8 on the board: a baseline, not a flagship

  • compare · Aug 10, 2026

    Sonnet vs Opus in 2026: same family, different invoice

  • compare · Jul 24, 2026

    Claude vs Gemini: coding, Elo, and output price — not a brand mashup

  • compare · Jul 24, 2026

    Claude vs GPT benchmark: this hub always remaps to the current Elo leaders

Back to All DispatchesExplore Comparison Matrix