CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. OpenAI o1 vs Yi-Lightning

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026

OpenAI o1 vs Yi-Lightning benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, OpenAI o1 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,512 vs 1,475), while Yi-Lightning leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (63.4%), while Yi-Lightning is more budget-friendly at $0.14/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose OpenAI o1 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Yi-Lightning if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

OpenAI o1 (4)Yi-Lightning (5)
OpenAI o1
4 of 9 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓Coding Elo✓LiveBench✓Context window
Yi-Lightning
5 of 9 Wins
✓SWE-bench✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price
OpenAI
Leads 4 of 9 metrics
OpenAI o1

OpenAI pioneer reasoning foundation model designed for complex science, math, and multi-step reasoning.

Elo 1,512$60/1M out
01.AI
Leads 5 of 9 metrics
Yi-Lightning

01.AI ultra-fast reasoning model delivering top LiveBench efficiency.

LightningElo 1,475$0.14/1M out

OpenAI o-Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

2 models

Currently comparing OpenAI o1 vs Yi-Lightning. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: OpenAI o1
OpenAI o3-mini$4.4

OpenAI o1 Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model A

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (Standard)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Thinking Delay
420 ms
Standard speed
Reasoning Depth
~1,500
Internal tokens
Cost / 1k Calls
$115.50
4.5× standard bill
Accuracy Boost
+4.5% accuracy
STEM & SWE-bench
Top Rival Showdowns for OpenAI o1
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderOpenAI o1 Wins

OpenAI o1

Δ 37 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderYi-Lightning Wins

Yi-Lightning

130 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderYi-Lightning Wins

Yi-Lightning

$0.14 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

OpenAI o1 (4)vsYi-Lightning (5)
OpenAI o1: 4W (44%)Overall: Yi-LightningYi-Lightning: 5W (56%)
← OpenAI o11 tiesYi-Lightning →
🏆OpenAI o1(3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
OpenAI o1vsYi-Lightning
Preference Elo
1,512vs1,475+37
Coding Elo
1,485vs1,480+5
SWE-bench
48.9%vs63.4%+14.5%
LiveBench
65.4%vs65%+0.4%
GPQA Diamond
78%vs78%
OpenAI o1: 3WYi-Lightning: 1W
🏆Yi-Lightning(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
OpenAI o1vsYi-Lightning
Output speed
45 tok/svs130 tok/s+85 tok/s
Time to first token
420 msvs150 ms+270 ms
OpenAI o1: 0WYi-Lightning: 2W
🏆Yi-Lightning(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
OpenAI o1vsYi-Lightning
Output price
$60/1Mvs$0.14/1M+$59.86/1M
Input price
$15/1Mvs$0.14/1M+$14.86/1M
Context window
200kvs16k+184k
OpenAI o1: 1WYi-Lightning: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+37
OpenAI o11,512
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Yi-Lightning1,475
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Coding Elo+5
OpenAI o11,485
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Yi-Lightning1,480
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
LiveBench+0.4%
OpenAI o165.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Yi-Lightning65%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
SWE-bench+14.5%
OpenAI o148.9%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Yi-Lightning63.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPQA Diamond
OpenAI o178%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Yi-Lightning78%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+270 ms
OpenAI o1420 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Yi-Lightning150 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+85 tok/s
OpenAI o145 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Yi-Lightning130 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$14.86/1M
OpenAI o1$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Yi-Lightning$0.14/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$59.86/1M
OpenAI o1$60/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Yi-Lightning$0.14/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+184k
OpenAI o1200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Yi-Lightning16k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkOpenAI o1Yi-LightningAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,512
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,475
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+37
Coding Elo
1,485
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,480
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+5
LiveBench
65.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
65%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+0.4%
SWE-bench
48.9%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
63.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+14.5%
GPQA Diamond
78%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
78%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Time to first token
420 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
150 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+270 ms
Output speed
45 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
130 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+85 tok/s
Input price
$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.14/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$14.86/1M
Output price
$60/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.14/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$59.86/1M
Context window
200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
16k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+184k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 100% with Yi-Lightning
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
OpenAI o1$1,425.00 / mo
In: $525Out: $900
Yi-Lightning$7.00 / mo
In: $4.9Out: $2.1
Estimated Cost Delta

Yi-Lightning is estimated to save $1,418.00/month ($17,016/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Yi-Lightning:Pick Yi-Lightning when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Yi-Lightning:Pick Yi-Lightning when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    OpenAI o1:Pick OpenAI o1 as the default general assistant.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsYi-Lightning

Higher SWE-bench (63.4%).

High-volume chatYi-Lightning

Lower output list price ($0.14/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIYi-Lightning

Lower TTFT (150 ms).

Long-document RAGOpenAI o1

Larger window (200k).

Screenshots / visionOpenAI o1

OpenAI o1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsYi-LightningHigher SWE-bench (63.4%).
High-volume chatYi-LightningLower output list price ($0.14/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIYi-LightningLower TTFT (150 ms).
Long-document RAGOpenAI o1Larger window (200k).
Screenshots / visionOpenAI o1OpenAI o1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/o1-vs-yi-lightning/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
OpenAI

OpenAI o1

Elo 1,512
SWE-bench48.9%
Speed (tok/s)45 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$15/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$60/1M
01.AI

Yi-Lightning

Elo 1,475
SWE-bench63.4%
Speed (tok/s)130 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.14/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.14/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, OpenAI o1 or Yi-Lightning?
OpenAI o1 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,512). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, OpenAI o1 or Yi-Lightning?
Yi-Lightning leads SWE-bench at 63.4% vs 48.9%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Yi-Lightning output tokens are $0.14/1M versus $60/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, OpenAI o1 or Yi-Lightning?
Yi-Lightning has the lower time-to-first-token (150 ms vs 420 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
OpenAI o1 accepts 200k tokens versus 16k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. OpenAI o1 and Yi-Lightning Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All OpenAI o1 matchups →|All Yi-Lightning matchups →
OpenAI o1 vs GPT-4o (previous gpt-flagship)OpenAI o1 vs GPT-4.5 Orion (next gpt-flagship)Yi-Lightning vs Yi-Large (previous other)Yi-Lightning vs Ernie 4.5 Turbo (next other)GPT-5.6 Terra vs OpenAI o1GPT-5 vs OpenAI o1