CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. OpenAI: o1 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

OpenAI: o1 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next is more budget-friendly at $0.8/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose OpenAI: o1 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

3 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

OpenAI: o1 (0)Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next (3)
OpenAI: o1
0 of 3 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next
3 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
OpenAI
OpenAI: o1

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (openai/o1). Preview until a second source matches.

Elo 1,512$60/1M out
Alibaba
Leads 3 of 3 metrics
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (qwen/qwen3-coder-next). Preview until a second source matches.

$0.7999999999999999/1M out

OpenAI: o1 Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model A

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (Standard)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Thinking Delay
420 ms
Standard speed
Reasoning Depth
~1,500
Internal tokens
Cost / 1k Calls
$115.50
4.5× standard bill
Accuracy Boost
+4.5% accuracy
STEM & SWE-bench
Top Rival Showdowns for OpenAI: o1
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderQwen: Qwen3 Coder Next Wins

Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

$0.7999999999999999 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

OpenAI: o1 (7)vsQwen: Qwen3 Coder Next (3)
OpenAI: o1: 7W (70%)Overall: OpenAI: o1Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next: 3W (30%)
← OpenAI: o1Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next →
🏆OpenAI: o1(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
OpenAI: o1vsQwen: Qwen3 Coder Next
Preference Elo
1,512vs—
Coding Elo
1,485vs—
SWE-bench
48.9%vs—
LiveBench
65.4%vs—
GPQA Diamond
78%vs—
OpenAI: o1: 5WQwen: Qwen3 Coder Next: 0W
🏆OpenAI: o1(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
OpenAI: o1vsQwen: Qwen3 Coder Next
Output speed
45 tok/svs—
Time to first token
420 msvs—
OpenAI: o1: 2WQwen: Qwen3 Coder Next: 0W
🏆Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
OpenAI: o1vsQwen: Qwen3 Coder Next
Output price
$60/1Mvs$0.8/1M+$59.2/1M
Input price
$15/1Mvs$0.12/1M+$14.88/1M
Context window
200kvs262k+62k
OpenAI: o1: 0WQwen: Qwen3 Coder Next: 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo
OpenAI: o11,512
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next—
Coding Elo
OpenAI: o11,485
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next—
LiveBench
OpenAI: o165.4%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next—
SWE-bench
OpenAI: o148.9%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next—
GPQA Diamond
OpenAI: o178%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next—
Time to first token
OpenAI: o1420 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next—
Output speed
OpenAI: o145 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next—
Input price+$14.88/1M
OpenAI: o1$15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next$0.12/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Output price+$59.2/1M
OpenAI: o1$60/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next$0.8/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Context window+62k
OpenAI: o1200k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next262k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
BenchmarkOpenAI: o1Qwen: Qwen3 Coder NextAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,512
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
Coding Elo
1,485
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
LiveBench
65.4%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
SWE-bench
48.9%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
78%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Time to first token
420 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Output speed
45 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Input price
$15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.12/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$14.88/1M
Output price
$60/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.8/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$59.2/1M
Context window
200k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
262k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+62k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 99% with Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
OpenAI: o1$1,425.00 / mo
In: $525Out: $900
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next$16.20 / mo
In: $4.2Out: $12
Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next is estimated to save $1,408.80/month ($16,906/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next:Pick Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatQwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

Lower output list price ($0.8/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGQwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

Larger window (262k).

Screenshots / visionOpenAI: o1

OpenAI: o1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatQwen: Qwen3 Coder NextLower output list price ($0.8/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGQwen: Qwen3 Coder NextLarger window (262k).
Screenshots / visionOpenAI: o1OpenAI: o1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/o1-vs-qwen3-coder-next/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
OpenAI

OpenAI: o1

Elo 1,512
SWE-bench48.9%
Speed (tok/s)45 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$15/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$60/1M
Alibaba

Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)262k
Input / 1M Tokens$0.12/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.8/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, OpenAI: o1 or Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, OpenAI: o1 or Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next output tokens are $0.8/1M versus $60/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, OpenAI: o1 or Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next accepts 262k tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. OpenAI: o1 and Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All OpenAI: o1 matchups →|All Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next matchups →
OpenAI: o1 vs GPT-4o (previous gpt-flagship)OpenAI: o1 vs GPT-4.5 Orion (next gpt-flagship)Qwen 3 Max vs OpenAI: o1GPT-5.6 Terra vs OpenAI: o1GPT-5 vs OpenAI: o1GPT-5.6 Sol vs OpenAI: o1