CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. OpenAI o1-mini vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026

OpenAI o1-mini vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, OpenAI o1-mini delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,445 vs 1,425), while Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (65.2%), while Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is more budget-friendly at $0.72/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose OpenAI o1-mini if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

10 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

OpenAI o1-mini (2)Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (8)
OpenAI o1-mini
2 of 10 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓GPQA Diamond
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
8 of 10 Wins
✓Coding Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
OpenAI
Leads 2 of 10 metrics
OpenAI o1-mini

OpenAI high-speed, cost-effective reasoning model optimized for STEM, math, and code generation.

Elo 1,445$4.4/1M out
Alibaba
Leads 8 of 10 metrics
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Alibaba dedicated open-weight code generation model with near-frontier SWE-bench Verified coding capability.

Elo 1,425$0.72/1M out
Top Rival Showdowns for OpenAI o1-mini
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderOpenAI o1-mini Wins

OpenAI o1-mini

Δ 20 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderQwen 2.5 Coder 32B Wins

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

110 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderQwen 2.5 Coder 32B Wins

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

$0.72 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

OpenAI o1-mini (2)vsQwen 2.5 Coder 32B (8)
OpenAI o1-mini: 2W (20%)Overall: Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BQwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 8W (80%)
← OpenAI o1-miniQwen 2.5 Coder 32B →
🏆Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B(3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
OpenAI o1-minivsQwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Preference Elo
1,445vs1,425+20
Coding Elo
1,468vs1,495+27
SWE-bench
56.4%vs65.2%+8.8%
LiveBench
62%vs64.8%+2.8%
GPQA Diamond
76.8%vs74%+2.8%
OpenAI o1-mini: 2WQwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 3W
🏆Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
OpenAI o1-minivsQwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Output speed
85 tok/svs110 tok/s+25 tok/s
Time to first token
280 msvs180 ms+100 ms
OpenAI o1-mini: 0WQwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 2W
🏆Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
OpenAI o1-minivsQwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Output price
$4.4/1Mvs$0.72/1M+$3.68/1M
Input price
$1.1/1Mvs$0.18/1M+$0.92/1M
Context window
128kvs131k+3k
OpenAI o1-mini: 0WQwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+20
OpenAI o1-mini1,445
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B1,425
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Coding Elo+27
OpenAI o1-mini1,468
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B1,495
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
LiveBench+2.8%
OpenAI o1-mini62%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B64.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
SWE-bench+8.8%
OpenAI o1-mini56.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B65.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPQA Diamond+2.8%
OpenAI o1-mini76.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B74%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+100 ms
OpenAI o1-mini280 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B180 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+25 tok/s
OpenAI o1-mini85 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B110 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$0.92/1M
OpenAI o1-mini$1.1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B$0.18/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$3.68/1M
OpenAI o1-mini$4.4/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B$0.72/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+3k
OpenAI o1-mini128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B131k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkOpenAI o1-miniQwen 2.5 Coder 32BAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,445
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,425
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+20
Coding Elo
1,468
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,495
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+27
LiveBench
62%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
64.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+2.8%
SWE-bench
56.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
65.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+8.8%
GPQA Diamond
76.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
74%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+2.8%
Time to first token
280 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
180 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+100 ms
Output speed
85 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
110 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+25 tok/s
Input price
$1.1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.18/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.92/1M
Output price
$4.4/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.72/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$3.68/1M
Context window
128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
131k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+3k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 84% with Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
OpenAI o1-mini$104.50 / mo
In: $38.5Out: $66
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B$17.10 / mo
In: $6.3Out: $10.8
Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is estimated to save $87.40/month ($1,049/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B:Pick Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B:Pick Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    OpenAI o1-mini:Pick OpenAI o1-mini as the default general assistant.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsQwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Higher SWE-bench (65.2%).

High-volume chatQwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Lower output list price ($0.72/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIQwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Lower TTFT (180 ms).

Long-document RAGQwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Larger window (131k).

Screenshots / visionOpenAI o1-mini

OpenAI o1-mini is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsQwen 2.5 Coder 32BHigher SWE-bench (65.2%).
High-volume chatQwen 2.5 Coder 32BLower output list price ($0.72/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIQwen 2.5 Coder 32BLower TTFT (180 ms).
Long-document RAGQwen 2.5 Coder 32BLarger window (131k).
Screenshots / visionOpenAI o1-miniOpenAI o1-mini is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/o1-mini-vs-qwen-2-5-coder-32b/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
OpenAI

OpenAI o1-mini

Elo 1,445
SWE-bench56.4%
Speed (tok/s)85 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$1.1/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$4.4/1M
Alibaba

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Elo 1,425
SWE-bench65.2%
Speed (tok/s)110 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.18/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.72/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, OpenAI o1-mini or Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B?
OpenAI o1-mini has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,445). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, OpenAI o1-mini or Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B?
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B leads SWE-bench at 65.2% vs 56.4%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B output tokens are $0.72/1M versus $4.4/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, OpenAI o1-mini or Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B?
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B has the lower time-to-first-token (180 ms vs 280 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B accepts 131k tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. OpenAI o1-mini and Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All OpenAI o1-mini matchups →|All Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B matchups →
OpenAI o1-mini vs GPT-4o mini (previous gpt-mini)OpenAI o1-mini vs OpenAI o3-mini (next gpt-mini)Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs Qwen 2.5 Plus (previous qwen)Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs Qwen3 235B (next qwen)Qwen QwQ 32B vs OpenAI o1-miniQwen 3 Max vs OpenAI o1-mini