Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, OpenAI o1 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,512 vs 1,468), while Llama 4 Maverick leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (57.1%), while Llama 4 Maverick is more budget-friendly at $0.6/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
10 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
Meta natively multimodal open-weight flagship.
OpenAI pioneer reasoning foundation model designed for complex science, math, and multi-step reasoning.
Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost
Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.
Δ 44 Arena Elo pts
130 tok/s
$0.6 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | OpenAI o1 | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +44 | ||
| Coding Elo | +33 | ||
| LiveBench | +2.6% | ||
| SWE-bench | +8.2% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +3.4% | ||
| Time to first token | +250 ms | ||
| Output speed | 130 tok/s | 45 tok/s | +85 tok/s |
| Input price | $0.2/1M | +$14.8/1M | |
| Output price | $0.6/1M | +$59.4/1M | |
| Context window | +849k |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Llama 4 Maverick is estimated to save $1,409.00/month ($16,908/year).
Higher SWE-bench (57.1%).
Lower output list price ($0.6/1M).
Lower TTFT (170 ms).
Larger window (1M).
Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (OpenAI o1).
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Llama 4 Maverick | Higher SWE-bench (57.1%). |
| High-volume chat | Llama 4 Maverick | Lower output list price ($0.6/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Llama 4 Maverick | Lower TTFT (170 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Llama 4 Maverick | Larger window (1M). |
| Screenshots / vision | OpenAI o1 | Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (OpenAI o1). |
Hub remaps to top Meta vs top Anthropic Elo. Usually Maverick vs Opus 5.
Apr 2026. The Llama vs Claude hub uses the top Meta Elo row — usually Maverick.
Dec 2024 instruct 70B. Still a self-host baseline. Llama 4 is the 2026 buy.
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/llama-4-maverick-vs-o1/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry
