CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Llama 3.1 70B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Llama 3.1 70B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Seed 2.1 Turbo delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,472 vs 1,240), while Seed 2.1 Turbo leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (63.2%), while Llama 3.1 70B is more budget-friendly at $0.4/1M per 1M output tokens, while Seed 2.1 Turbo provides faster response streaming (160 tok/s). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Seed 2.1 Turbo if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Llama 3.1 70B if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Llama 3.1 70B (1)Seed 2.1 Turbo (8)
Llama 3.1 70B
1 of 9 Wins
✓Output price
Seed 2.1 Turbo
8 of 9 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Context window
Meta
Leads 1 of 9 metrics
Llama 3.1 70B

Llama 3.1 70B instruct. Predecessor to 3.3 70B and Llama 4.

Elo 1,240$0.4/1M out
ByteDance
Leads 8 of 9 metrics
Seed 2.1 Turbo

ByteDance Seed 2.1 Turbo, listed on public model timelines as an Aug 10 2026 API drop.

Seed 2.1Elo 1,472$1.1/1M out
Top Rival Showdowns for Llama 3.1 70B
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference LeaderSeed 2.1 Turbo Wins

Seed 2.1 Turbo

Δ 232 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderSeed 2.1 Turbo Wins

Seed 2.1 Turbo

160 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderLlama 3.1 70B Wins

Llama 3.1 70B

$0.4 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Llama 3.1 70B (1)vsSeed 2.1 Turbo (9)
Llama 3.1 70B: 1W (10%)Overall: Seed 2.1 TurboSeed 2.1 Turbo: 9W (90%)
← Llama 3.1 70BSeed 2.1 Turbo →
🏆Seed 2.1 Turbo(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Llama 3.1 70BvsSeed 2.1 Turbo
Preference Elo
1,240vs1,472+232
Coding Elo
—vs1,480
SWE-bench
40.2%vs63.2%+23%
LiveBench
46.8%vs64.8%+18%
GPQA Diamond
48%vs76.8%+28.8%
Llama 3.1 70B: 0WSeed 2.1 Turbo: 5W
🏆Seed 2.1 Turbo(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Llama 3.1 70BvsSeed 2.1 Turbo
Output speed
125 tok/svs160 tok/s+35 tok/s
Time to first token
170 msvs120 ms+50 ms
Llama 3.1 70B: 0WSeed 2.1 Turbo: 2W
🏆Seed 2.1 Turbo(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Llama 3.1 70BvsSeed 2.1 Turbo
Output price
$0.4/1Mvs$1.1/1M+$0.7/1M
Input price
$0.35/1Mvs$0.27/1M+$0.08/1M
Context window
128kvs256k+128k
Llama 3.1 70B: 1WSeed 2.1 Turbo: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+232
Llama 3.1 70B1,240
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Seed 2.1 Turbo1,472
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Coding Elo
Llama 3.1 70B—
Seed 2.1 Turbo1,480
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
LiveBench+18%
Llama 3.1 70B46.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Seed 2.1 Turbo64.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
SWE-bench+23%
Llama 3.1 70B40.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Seed 2.1 Turbo63.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
GPQA Diamond+28.8%
Llama 3.1 70B48%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Seed 2.1 Turbo76.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Time to first token+50 ms
Llama 3.1 70B170 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Seed 2.1 Turbo120 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Output speed+35 tok/s
Llama 3.1 70B125 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Seed 2.1 Turbo160 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Input price+$0.08/1M
Llama 3.1 70B$0.35/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Seed 2.1 Turbo$0.27/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Output price+$0.7/1M
Llama 3.1 70B$0.4/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Seed 2.1 Turbo$1.1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Context window+128k
Llama 3.1 70B128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Seed 2.1 Turbo256k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70BSeed 2.1 TurboAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,240
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,472
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+232
Coding Elo—
1,480
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
—
LiveBench
46.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
64.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+18%
SWE-bench
40.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
63.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+23%
GPQA Diamond
48%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
76.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+28.8%
Time to first token
170 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
120 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+50 ms
Output speed
125 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
160 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+35 tok/s
Input price
$0.35/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.27/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+$0.08/1M
Output price
$0.4/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$1.1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+$0.7/1M
Context window
128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
256k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+128k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 30% with Llama 3.1 70B
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Llama 3.1 70B$18.25 / mo
In: $12.25Out: $6
Seed 2.1 Turbo$25.95 / mo
In: $9.45Out: $16.5
Estimated Cost Delta

Llama 3.1 70B is estimated to save $7.70/month ($92/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Seed 2.1 Turbo:Pick Seed 2.1 Turbo when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Llama 3.1 70B:Pick Llama 3.1 70B when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Seed 2.1 Turbo:Pick Seed 2.1 Turbo when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsSeed 2.1 Turbo

Higher SWE-bench (63.2%).

High-volume chatLlama 3.1 70B

Lower output list price ($0.4/1M).

Voice / low-latency UISeed 2.1 Turbo

Lower TTFT (120 ms).

Long-document RAGSeed 2.1 Turbo

Larger window (256k).

Screenshots / visionSeed 2.1 Turbo

Seed 2.1 Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsSeed 2.1 TurboHigher SWE-bench (63.2%).
High-volume chatLlama 3.1 70BLower output list price ($0.4/1M).
Voice / low-latency UISeed 2.1 TurboLower TTFT (120 ms).
Long-document RAGSeed 2.1 TurboLarger window (256k).
Screenshots / visionSeed 2.1 TurboSeed 2.1 Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchAug 10, 2026

Seed 2.1 Turbo (Aug 10): ByteDance’s API drop on the public timeline

Listed on public model timelines as an Aug 10 2026 API drop. Preview-quality story, indexable because we have a full snapshot.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/llama-3-1-70b-vs-seed-2-1-turbo/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Meta

Llama 3.1 70B

Elo 1,240
SWE-bench40.2%
Speed (tok/s)125 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.35/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.4/1M
ByteDance

Seed 2.1 Turbo

Elo 1,472
SWE-bench63.2%
Speed (tok/s)160 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.27/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1.1/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Llama 3.1 70B or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Seed 2.1 Turbo has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,472). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Llama 3.1 70B or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Seed 2.1 Turbo leads SWE-bench at 63.2% vs 40.2%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Llama 3.1 70B output tokens are $0.4/1M versus $1.1/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Llama 3.1 70B or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Seed 2.1 Turbo has the lower time-to-first-token (120 ms vs 170 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Seed 2.1 Turbo accepts 256k tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
Llama 3.1 70B is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Llama 3.1 70B and Seed 2.1 Turbo Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Aug 10, 2026

    Seed 2.1 Turbo (Aug 10): ByteDance’s API drop on the public timeline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Llama 3.1 70B matchups →|All Seed 2.1 Turbo matchups →
Llama 3.1 70B vs Llama 3.1 405B (previous llama)Llama 3.1 70B vs Llama 3.3 70B (next llama)Llama 4 Maverick vs Seed 2.1 TurboDoubao Pro 1.5 vs Seed 2.1 TurboDoubao Lite 1.5 vs Seed 2.1 TurboLlama 3.1 405B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo