CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Kimi Chat 1.5 vs OpenAI o3-mini

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026

Kimi Chat 1.5 vs OpenAI o3-mini benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, OpenAI o3-mini delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,560 vs 1,420), while OpenAI o3-mini leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (78.5%), while Kimi Chat 1.5 is more budget-friendly at $0.8/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose OpenAI o3-mini if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Kimi Chat 1.5 if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

10 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Kimi Chat 1.5 (5)OpenAI o3-mini (5)
Kimi Chat 1.5
5 of 10 Wins
✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
OpenAI o3-mini
5 of 10 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓Coding Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond
Moonshot
Leads 5 of 10 metrics
Kimi Chat 1.5

Moonshot ultra-long context model supporting up to 2 million tokens per request.

2M ContextElo 1,420$0.8/1M out
OpenAI
Leads 5 of 10 metrics
OpenAI o3-mini

OpenAI cost-efficient reasoning model with adjustable thinking effort and top coding benchmark scores.

o3-miniElo 1,560$4.4/1M out

Kimi Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

4 models

Currently comparing Kimi Chat 1.5 vs OpenAI o3-mini. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: Kimi Chat 1.5
Kimi K3$2.5Kimi K2.5 Max$2Kimi K2$1.4

OpenAI o3-mini Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model B

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (Standard)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Thinking Delay
290 ms
Standard speed
Reasoning Depth
~1,500
Internal tokens
Cost / 1k Calls
$8.47
4.5× standard bill
Accuracy Boost
+4.5% accuracy
STEM & SWE-bench
Top Rival Showdowns for Kimi Chat 1.5
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference LeaderOpenAI o3-mini Wins

OpenAI o3-mini

Δ 140 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderKimi Chat 1.5 Wins

Kimi Chat 1.5

95 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderKimi Chat 1.5 Wins

Kimi Chat 1.5

$0.8 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Kimi Chat 1.5 (5)vsOpenAI o3-mini (5)
Kimi Chat 1.5: 5W (50%)Overall: Even matchupOpenAI o3-mini: 5W (50%)
← Kimi Chat 1.5OpenAI o3-mini →
🏆OpenAI o3-mini(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Kimi Chat 1.5vsOpenAI o3-mini
Preference Elo
1,420vs1,560+140
Coding Elo
1,390vs1,585+195
SWE-bench
51%vs78.5%+27.5%
LiveBench
58%vs72.4%+14.4%
GPQA Diamond
71.5%vs87.2%+15.7%
Kimi Chat 1.5: 0WOpenAI o3-mini: 5W
🏆Kimi Chat 1.5(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Kimi Chat 1.5vsOpenAI o3-mini
Output speed
95 tok/svs92 tok/s+3 tok/s
Time to first token
210 msvs290 ms+80 ms
Kimi Chat 1.5: 2WOpenAI o3-mini: 0W
🏆Kimi Chat 1.5(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Kimi Chat 1.5vsOpenAI o3-mini
Output price
$0.8/1Mvs$4.4/1M+$3.6/1M
Input price
$0.2/1Mvs$1.1/1M+$0.9/1M
Context window
2Mvs200k+1.8M
Kimi Chat 1.5: 3WOpenAI o3-mini: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+140
Kimi Chat 1.51,420
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o3-mini1,560
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Coding Elo+195
Kimi Chat 1.51,390
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o3-mini1,585
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
LiveBench+14.4%
Kimi Chat 1.558%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o3-mini72.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
SWE-bench+27.5%
Kimi Chat 1.551%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o3-mini78.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPQA Diamond+15.7%
Kimi Chat 1.571.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o3-mini87.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+80 ms
Kimi Chat 1.5210 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o3-mini290 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+3 tok/s
Kimi Chat 1.595 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o3-mini92 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$0.9/1M
Kimi Chat 1.5$0.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o3-mini$1.1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$3.6/1M
Kimi Chat 1.5$0.8/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o3-mini$4.4/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+1.8M
Kimi Chat 1.52M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o3-mini200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkKimi Chat 1.5OpenAI o3-miniAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,420
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,560
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+140
Coding Elo
1,390
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,585
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+195
LiveBench
58%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
72.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+14.4%
SWE-bench
51%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
78.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+27.5%
GPQA Diamond
71.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
87.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+15.7%
Time to first token
210 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
290 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+80 ms
Output speed
95 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
92 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+3 tok/s
Input price
$0.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$1.1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.9/1M
Output price
$0.8/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$4.4/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$3.6/1M
Context window
2M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+1.8M
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 82% with Kimi Chat 1.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Kimi Chat 1.5$19.00 / mo
In: $7Out: $12
OpenAI o3-mini$104.50 / mo
In: $38.5Out: $66
Estimated Cost Delta

Kimi Chat 1.5 is estimated to save $85.50/month ($1,026/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    OpenAI o3-mini:Pick OpenAI o3-mini when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Kimi Chat 1.5:Pick Kimi Chat 1.5 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Kimi Chat 1.5:Pick Kimi Chat 1.5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsOpenAI o3-mini

Higher SWE-bench (78.5%).

High-volume chatKimi Chat 1.5

Lower output list price ($0.8/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIKimi Chat 1.5

Lower TTFT (210 ms).

Long-document RAGKimi Chat 1.5

Larger window (2M).

Screenshots / visionOpenAI o3-mini

OpenAI o3-mini is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsOpenAI o3-miniHigher SWE-bench (78.5%).
High-volume chatKimi Chat 1.5Lower output list price ($0.8/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIKimi Chat 1.5Lower TTFT (210 ms).
Long-document RAGKimi Chat 1.5Larger window (2M).
Screenshots / visionOpenAI o3-miniOpenAI o3-mini is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/kimi-1-5-long-vs-o3-mini/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Moonshot

Kimi Chat 1.5

Elo 1,420
SWE-bench51%
Speed (tok/s)95 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.2/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.8/1M
OpenAI

OpenAI o3-mini

Elo 1,560
SWE-bench78.5%
Speed (tok/s)92 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$1.1/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$4.4/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Kimi Chat 1.5 or OpenAI o3-mini?
OpenAI o3-mini has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,560). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Kimi Chat 1.5 or OpenAI o3-mini?
OpenAI o3-mini leads SWE-bench at 78.5% vs 51%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Kimi Chat 1.5 output tokens are $0.8/1M versus $4.4/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Kimi Chat 1.5 or OpenAI o3-mini?
Kimi Chat 1.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (210 ms vs 290 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Kimi Chat 1.5 accepts 2M tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Kimi Chat 1.5 and OpenAI o3-mini Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Kimi Chat 1.5 matchups →|All OpenAI o3-mini matchups →
Kimi Chat 1.5 vs Kimi K2 (next kimi)OpenAI o3-mini vs OpenAI o1-mini (previous gpt-mini)OpenAI o3-mini vs GPT-5 mini (next gpt-mini)Kimi K2.5 Max vs OpenAI o3-miniKimi K3 vs OpenAI o3-miniGPT-4.5 Orion vs OpenAI o3-mini