CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Tencent: Hy3 preview vs Kimi Chat 1.5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Tencent: Hy3 preview vs Kimi Chat 1.5 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Tencent: Hy3 preview is more budget-friendly at $0.6/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both Tencent: Hy3 preview and Kimi Chat 1.5 present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

3 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Tencent: Hy3 preview (2)Kimi Chat 1.5 (1)
Tencent: Hy3 preview
2 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price
Kimi Chat 1.5
1 of 3 Wins
✓Context window
tencent
Leads 2 of 3 metrics
Tencent: Hy3 preview

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (tencent/hy3-preview). Preview until a second source matches.

$0.6/1M out
Moonshot
Leads 1 of 3 metrics
Kimi Chat 1.5

Moonshot ultra-long context model supporting up to 2 million tokens per request.

2M ContextElo 1,420$0.8/1M out
Top Rival Showdowns for Tencent: Hy3 preview
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderTencent: Hy3 preview Wins

Tencent: Hy3 preview

$0.6 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Tencent: Hy3 preview (2)vsKimi Chat 1.5 (8)
Tencent: Hy3 preview: 2W (20%)Overall: Kimi Chat 1.5Kimi Chat 1.5: 8W (80%)
← Tencent: Hy3 previewKimi Chat 1.5 →
🏆Kimi Chat 1.5(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Tencent: Hy3 previewvsKimi Chat 1.5
Preference Elo
—vs1,420
Coding Elo
—vs1,390
SWE-bench
—vs51%
LiveBench
—vs58%
GPQA Diamond
—vs71.5%
Tencent: Hy3 preview: 0WKimi Chat 1.5: 5W
🏆Kimi Chat 1.5(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Tencent: Hy3 previewvsKimi Chat 1.5
Output speed
—vs95 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs210 ms
Tencent: Hy3 preview: 0WKimi Chat 1.5: 2W
🏆Tencent: Hy3 preview(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Tencent: Hy3 previewvsKimi Chat 1.5
Output price
$0.6/1Mvs$0.8/1M+$0.2/1M
Input price
$0.18/1Mvs$0.2/1M+$0.02/1M
Context window
262kvs2M+1.7M
Tencent: Hy3 preview: 2WKimi Chat 1.5: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo
Tencent: Hy3 preview—
Kimi Chat 1.51,420
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Coding Elo
Tencent: Hy3 preview—
Kimi Chat 1.51,390
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
LiveBench
Tencent: Hy3 preview—
Kimi Chat 1.558%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
SWE-bench
Tencent: Hy3 preview—
Kimi Chat 1.551%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
GPQA Diamond
Tencent: Hy3 preview—
Kimi Chat 1.571.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token
Tencent: Hy3 preview—
Kimi Chat 1.5210 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed
Tencent: Hy3 preview—
Kimi Chat 1.595 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$0.02/1M
Tencent: Hy3 preview$0.18/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Kimi Chat 1.5$0.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$0.2/1M
Tencent: Hy3 preview$0.6/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Kimi Chat 1.5$0.8/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+1.7M
Tencent: Hy3 preview262k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Kimi Chat 1.52M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkTencent: Hy3 previewKimi Chat 1.5Advantage Delta
Preference Elo—
1,420
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
Coding Elo—
1,390
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
LiveBench—
58%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
SWE-bench—
51%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
GPQA Diamond—
71.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Time to first token—
210 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Output speed—
95 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Input price
$0.18/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.02/1M
Output price
$0.6/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.8/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.2/1M
Context window
262k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
2M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+1.7M
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 19% with Tencent: Hy3 preview
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Tencent: Hy3 preview$15.30 / mo
In: $6.3Out: $9
Kimi Chat 1.5$19.00 / mo
In: $7Out: $12
Estimated Cost Delta

Tencent: Hy3 preview is estimated to save $3.70/month ($44/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Tencent: Hy3 preview:Pick Tencent: Hy3 preview when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Kimi Chat 1.5:Pick Kimi Chat 1.5 for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatTencent: Hy3 preview

Lower output list price ($0.6/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGKimi Chat 1.5

Larger window (2M).

Screenshots / visionKimi Chat 1.5

Kimi Chat 1.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatTencent: Hy3 previewLower output list price ($0.6/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGKimi Chat 1.5Larger window (2M).
Screenshots / visionKimi Chat 1.5Kimi Chat 1.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/hy3-preview-vs-kimi-1-5-long/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
tencent

Tencent: Hy3 preview

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)262k
Input / 1M Tokens$0.18/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.6/1M
Moonshot

Kimi Chat 1.5

Elo 1,420
SWE-bench51%
Speed (tok/s)95 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.2/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.8/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Tencent: Hy3 preview or Kimi Chat 1.5?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Tencent: Hy3 preview or Kimi Chat 1.5?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Tencent: Hy3 preview output tokens are $0.6/1M versus $0.8/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Tencent: Hy3 preview or Kimi Chat 1.5?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Kimi Chat 1.5 accepts 2M tokens versus 262k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Tencent: Hy3 preview and Kimi Chat 1.5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Tencent: Hy3 preview matchups →|All Kimi Chat 1.5 matchups →
Kimi Chat 1.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (next kimi)Kimi K3 vs Kimi Chat 1.5MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Kimi Chat 1.5Claude Opus 4.5 vs Kimi Chat 1.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi Chat 1.5Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Kimi Chat 1.5