Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026

GPT Image 1.5 vs Midjourney v7 benchmark

Name: GPT Image 1.5 vs Midjourney v7 AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Comparing verified benchmark accuracy, speed, and token pricing between GPT Image 1.5 and Midjourney v7. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Share Analysis:

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

5 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

GPT Image 1.5 (1)Midjourney v7 (4)

GPT Image 1.5

1 of 5 Wins

✓Generation time

Midjourney v7

4 of 5 Wins

✓Image Elo✓Price per 1k images✓Prompt adherence✓Text rendering

OpenAI

Leads 1 of 5 metrics

GPT Image 1.5

Previous OpenAI image generation flagship. High fidelity with proven enterprise reliability.

Img Elo 1,313$133/1k imgs

Midjourney

Leads 4 of 5 metrics

Midjourney v7

Midjourney v7 premier creative image generation model with unparalleled stylistic nuances, coherent hands/anatomy, and cinematic grading.

Img Elo 1,340$120/1k imgs

Top Rival Showdowns for GPT Image 1.5

All Matchups

Compare vs:vs Reve 2.1 vs Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)vs FLUX.2 [max]vs Ideogram 4.0 (Quality)vs Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro

Image Quality LeaderMidjourney v7 Wins

Midjourney v7

Δ 27 Image Elo pts

Generation Speed LeaderGPT Image 1.5 Wins

GPT Image 1.5

3.5s per render

Value per Dollar LeaderMidjourney v7 Wins

Midjourney v7

$120/1k images

Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

GPT Image 1.5 (1)vsMidjourney v7 (4)

GPT Image 1.5: 1W (20%)Overall: Midjourney v7Midjourney v7: 4W (80%)

← GPT Image 1.5Midjourney v7 →

🏆Midjourney v7(3/3)

Visual Quality & Adherence

Arena Preference Elo, prompt fidelity & typography score

Benchmark

GPT Image 1.5vsMidjourney v7

Image Elo

1,313vs1,340+27

Prompt adherence

91%vs94%+3%

Text rendering

90.5%vs91%+0.5%

GPT Image 1.5: 0WMidjourney v7: 3W

🏆GPT Image 1.5(1/1)

Generation Latency

Time to render full-resolution image snapshot (seconds)

Benchmark

GPT Image 1.5vsMidjourney v7

Generation time

3.5svs6s+2.5s

GPT Image 1.5: 1WMidjourney v7: 0W

🏆Midjourney v7(1/1)

Cost Efficiency

API inference cost per 1,000 generated images

Benchmark

GPT Image 1.5vsMidjourney v7

Price per 1k images

$133/1kvs$120/1k+$13/1k

GPT Image 1.5: 0WMidjourney v7: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Image Elo+27

GPT Image 1.51,313

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Midjourney v71,340

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Generation time+2.5s

GPT Image 1.53.5s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Midjourney v76s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Price per 1k images+$13/1k

GPT Image 1.5$133/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Midjourney v7$120/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Prompt adherence+3%

GPT Image 1.591%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Midjourney v794%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Text rendering+0.5%

GPT Image 1.590.5%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Midjourney v791%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Benchmark	GPT Image 1.5	Midjourney v7	Advantage Delta
Image Elo	1,313 seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	1,340 seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+27
Generation time	3.5s seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	6s seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+2.5s
Price per 1k images	$133/1k seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	$120/1k seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+$13/1k
Prompt adherence	91% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	94% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+3%
Text rendering	90.5% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	91% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+0.5%

Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 10% with Midjourney v7

Monthly Image Production Volume25k images / month (25000 imgs)

Quick Presets:

GPT Image 1.5$3,325.00 / mo

Rate: $133/1k

Midjourney v7$3,000.00 / mo

Rate: $120/1k

Estimated Cost Delta

Midjourney v7 is estimated to save $325.00/month ($3,900/year).

Based on 25k images generated

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visioninsufficient data

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	insufficient data	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/gpt-image-1-5-vs-midjourney-v7/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK

OpenAI

GPT Image 1.5

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)—

Input / 1M Tokens$133/1k

Output / 1M Tokens$133/1k

Midjourney

Midjourney v7

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)—

Input / 1M Tokens$120/1k

Output / 1M Tokens$120/1k

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, GPT Image 1.5 or Midjourney v7?: We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, GPT Image 1.5 or Midjourney v7?: SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: List prices are missing for at least one model.
Which is faster, GPT Image 1.5 or Midjourney v7?: We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?: Context window is missing for at least one model.
Can I self-host either model?: Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. GPT Image 1.5 and Midjourney v7 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All GPT Image 1.5 matchups →|All Midjourney v7 matchups →

GPT Image 1.5 vs DALL-E 3 (previous gpt-image)GPT Image 1.5 vs GPT Image 2 (High) (next gpt-image)Midjourney v7 vs Midjourney v6.1 (previous midjourney)GPT Image 2 (High) vs Midjourney v7 GPT Image 2 (Low / Fast) vs Midjourney v7 DALL-E 3 vs Midjourney v7

Benchmark

GPT Image 1.5

Midjourney v7

Advantage Delta

Image Elo

1,313

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

1,340

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+27

Generation time

3.5s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+2.5s

Price per 1k images

$133/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

$120/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+$13/1k

Prompt adherence

91%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

94%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+3%

Text rendering

90.5%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

91%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+0.5%

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visioninsufficient data

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	insufficient data	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, GPT Image 1.5 or Midjourney v7?

We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.

Which is better at coding, GPT Image 1.5 or Midjourney v7?

SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

List prices are missing for at least one model.

Which is faster, GPT Image 1.5 or Midjourney v7?

We do not have TTFT for both models.

Which has the larger context window?

Context window is missing for at least one model.

Can I self-host either model?

Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. GPT Image 1.5 and Midjourney v7 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.