CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. GPT-5 vs Yi-Lightning

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026

GPT-5 vs Yi-Lightning benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, GPT-5 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,558 vs 1,475), while GPT-5 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (68.4%), while Yi-Lightning is more budget-friendly at $0.14/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose GPT-5 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Yi-Lightning if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

10 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

GPT-5 (6)Yi-Lightning (4)
GPT-5
6 of 10 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓Coding Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond✓Context window
Yi-Lightning
4 of 10 Wins
✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price
OpenAI
Leads 6 of 10 metrics
GPT-5

OpenAI flagship reasoning model for 2025–26. Strong general preference Elo and multimodal coverage.

Elo 1,558$10/1M out
01.AI
Leads 4 of 10 metrics
Yi-Lightning

01.AI ultra-fast reasoning model delivering top LiveBench efficiency.

LightningElo 1,475$0.14/1M out

GPT-5 Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

2 models

Currently comparing GPT-5 vs Yi-Lightning. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: GPT-5
GPT-5 mini$2

GPT-5 Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model A

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (Standard)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Thinking Delay
290 ms
Standard speed
Reasoning Depth
~1,500
Internal tokens
Cost / 1k Calls
$18.63
5.1× standard bill
Accuracy Boost
+4.5% accuracy
STEM & SWE-bench
Top Rival Showdowns for GPT-5
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderGPT-5 Wins

GPT-5

Δ 83 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderYi-Lightning Wins

Yi-Lightning

130 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderYi-Lightning Wins

Yi-Lightning

$0.14 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

GPT-5 (6)vsYi-Lightning (4)
GPT-5: 6W (60%)Overall: GPT-5Yi-Lightning: 4W (40%)
← GPT-5Yi-Lightning →
🏆GPT-5(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
GPT-5vsYi-Lightning
Preference Elo
1,558vs1,475+83
Coding Elo
1,540vs1,480+60
SWE-bench
68.4%vs63.4%+5%
LiveBench
69.8%vs65%+4.8%
GPQA Diamond
85.2%vs78%+7.2%
GPT-5: 5WYi-Lightning: 0W
🏆Yi-Lightning(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
GPT-5vsYi-Lightning
Output speed
78 tok/svs130 tok/s+52 tok/s
Time to first token
290 msvs150 ms+140 ms
GPT-5: 0WYi-Lightning: 2W
🏆Yi-Lightning(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
GPT-5vsYi-Lightning
Output price
$10/1Mvs$0.14/1M+$9.86/1M
Input price
$1.25/1Mvs$0.14/1M+$1.11/1M
Context window
400kvs16k+384k
GPT-5: 1WYi-Lightning: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+83
GPT-51,558
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Yi-Lightning1,475
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Coding Elo+60
GPT-51,540
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Yi-Lightning1,480
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
LiveBench+4.8%
GPT-569.8%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
Yi-Lightning65%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
SWE-bench+5%
GPT-568.4%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
Yi-Lightning63.4%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
GPQA Diamond+7.2%
GPT-585.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Yi-Lightning78%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+140 ms
GPT-5290 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Yi-Lightning150 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+52 tok/s
GPT-578 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Yi-Lightning130 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$1.11/1M
GPT-5$1.25/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Yi-Lightning$0.14/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$9.86/1M
GPT-5$10/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Yi-Lightning$0.14/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+384k
GPT-5400k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Yi-Lightning16k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkGPT-5Yi-LightningAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,558
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
1,475
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
+83
Coding Elo
1,540
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
1,480
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
+60
LiveBench
69.8%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
65%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
+4.8%
SWE-bench
68.4%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
63.4%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
+5%
GPQA Diamond
85.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
78%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+7.2%
Time to first token
290 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
150 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+140 ms
Output speed
78 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
130 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+52 tok/s
Input price
$1.25/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.14/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$1.11/1M
Output price
$10/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.14/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$9.86/1M
Context window
400k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
16k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+384k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 96% with Yi-Lightning
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
GPT-5$193.75 / mo
In: $43.75Out: $150
Yi-Lightning$7.00 / mo
In: $4.9Out: $2.1
Estimated Cost Delta

Yi-Lightning is estimated to save $186.75/month ($2,241/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    GPT-5:Pick GPT-5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Yi-Lightning:Pick Yi-Lightning when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Yi-Lightning:Pick Yi-Lightning when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGPT-5

Higher SWE-bench (68.4%).

High-volume chatYi-Lightning

Lower output list price ($0.14/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIYi-Lightning

Lower TTFT (150 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5

Larger window (400k).

Screenshots / visionGPT-5

GPT-5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGPT-5Higher SWE-bench (68.4%).
High-volume chatYi-LightningLower output list price ($0.14/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIYi-LightningLower TTFT (150 ms).
Long-document RAGGPT-5Larger window (400k).
Screenshots / visionGPT-5GPT-5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchAug 8, 2025

GPT-5 (2025) remains the legacy OpenAI flagship baseline

Still a common compare target. 5.6 Sol replaced it as the buy; GPT-5 stays for old URLs.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/gpt-5-vs-yi-lightning/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
OpenAI

GPT-5

Elo 1,558
SWE-bench68.4%
Speed (tok/s)78 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$1.25/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$10/1M
01.AI

Yi-Lightning

Elo 1,475
SWE-bench63.4%
Speed (tok/s)130 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.14/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.14/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, GPT-5 or Yi-Lightning?
GPT-5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,558). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, GPT-5 or Yi-Lightning?
GPT-5 leads SWE-bench at 68.4% vs 63.4%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Yi-Lightning output tokens are $0.14/1M versus $10/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, GPT-5 or Yi-Lightning?
Yi-Lightning has the lower time-to-first-token (150 ms vs 290 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5 accepts 400k tokens versus 16k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. GPT-5 and Yi-Lightning Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Aug 8, 2025

    GPT-5 (2025) remains the legacy OpenAI flagship baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All GPT-5 matchups →|All Yi-Lightning matchups →
GPT-5 vs GPT-4.5 Orion (previous gpt-flagship)GPT-5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol (next gpt-flagship)Yi-Lightning vs Yi-Large (previous other)Yi-Lightning vs Ernie 4.5 Turbo (next other)GPT-5.6 Terra vs GPT-5OpenAI: o3 Mini vs GPT-5