CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. GPT-5 mini vs Qwen3.8 27B

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

GPT-5 mini vs Qwen3.8 27B benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, GPT-5 mini delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,410 vs 1,398), while Qwen3.8 27B leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (58.8%), while Qwen3.8 27B is more budget-friendly at $0.4/1M per 1M output tokens, while GPT-5 mini provides faster response streaming (155 tok/s). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose GPT-5 mini if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Qwen3.8 27B if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

GPT-5 mini (4)Qwen3.8 27B (5)
GPT-5 mini
4 of 9 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓LiveBench✓Output speed✓Context window
Qwen3.8 27B
5 of 9 Wins
✓Coding Elo✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond✓Input price✓Output price
OpenAI
Leads 4 of 9 metrics
GPT-5 mini

Cost-efficient GPT-5 distill for high-volume agents.

Mini DistillElo 1,410$2/1M out
Alibaba
Leads 5 of 9 metrics
Qwen3.8 27B

Alibaba open-weight 27B drop dated Aug 14 2026. Dense enough to self-host; not a frontier MoE.

27B DenseElo 1,398$0.4/1M out

GPT-5 Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

2 models

Currently comparing GPT-5 mini vs Qwen3.8 27B. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: GPT-5 mini
GPT-5$20
Top Rival Showdowns for GPT-5 mini
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderGPT-5 mini Wins

GPT-5 mini

Δ 12 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderGPT-5 mini Wins

GPT-5 mini

155 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderQwen3.8 27B Wins

Qwen3.8 27B

$0.4 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

GPT-5 mini (4)vsQwen3.8 27B (5)
GPT-5 mini: 4W (44%)Overall: Qwen3.8 27BQwen3.8 27B: 5W (56%)
← GPT-5 mini1 tiesQwen3.8 27B →
🏆Qwen3.8 27B(3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
GPT-5 minivsQwen3.8 27B
Preference Elo
1,410vs1,398+12
Coding Elo
1,395vs1,422+27
SWE-bench
52.4%vs58.8%+6.4%
LiveBench
61.2%vs60.6%+0.6%
GPQA Diamond
72%vs73.4%+1.4%
GPT-5 mini: 2WQwen3.8 27B: 3W
🏆GPT-5 mini(1/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
GPT-5 minivsQwen3.8 27B
Output speed
155 tok/svs152 tok/s+3 tok/s
Time to first token
140 msvs140 ms
GPT-5 mini: 1WQwen3.8 27B: 0W
🏆Qwen3.8 27B(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
GPT-5 minivsQwen3.8 27B
Output price
$2/1Mvs$0.4/1M+$1.6/1M
Input price
$0.25/1Mvs$0.1/1M+$0.15/1M
Context window
400kvs131k+269k
GPT-5 mini: 1WQwen3.8 27B: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+12
GPT-5 mini1,410
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen3.8 27B1,398
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Coding Elo+27
GPT-5 mini1,395
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen3.8 27B1,422
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
LiveBench+0.6%
GPT-5 mini61.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen3.8 27B60.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
SWE-bench+6.4%
GPT-5 mini52.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen3.8 27B58.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
GPQA Diamond+1.4%
GPT-5 mini72%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen3.8 27B73.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Time to first token
GPT-5 mini140 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen3.8 27B140 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Output speed+3 tok/s
GPT-5 mini155 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen3.8 27B152 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Input price+$0.15/1M
GPT-5 mini$0.25/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen3.8 27B$0.1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Output price+$1.6/1M
GPT-5 mini$2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen3.8 27B$0.4/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Context window+269k
GPT-5 mini400k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen3.8 27B131k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
BenchmarkGPT-5 miniQwen3.8 27BAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,410
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,398
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+12
Coding Elo
1,395
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,422
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+27
LiveBench
61.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
60.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+0.6%
SWE-bench
52.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
58.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+6.4%
GPQA Diamond
72%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
73.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+1.4%
Time to first token
140 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
140 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
—
Output speed
155 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
152 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+3 tok/s
Input price
$0.25/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+$0.15/1M
Output price
$2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.4/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+$1.6/1M
Context window
400k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
131k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+269k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 75% with Qwen3.8 27B
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
GPT-5 mini$38.75 / mo
In: $8.75Out: $30
Qwen3.8 27B$9.50 / mo
In: $3.5Out: $6
Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen3.8 27B is estimated to save $29.25/month ($351/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Qwen3.8 27B:Pick Qwen3.8 27B when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    GPT-5 mini:Pick GPT-5 mini when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    GPT-5 mini:Pick GPT-5 mini as the default general assistant.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsQwen3.8 27B

Higher SWE-bench (58.8%).

High-volume chatQwen3.8 27B

Lower output list price ($0.4/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5 mini

Lower TTFT (140 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5 mini

Larger window (400k).

Screenshots / visionGPT-5 mini

GPT-5 mini is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsQwen3.8 27BHigher SWE-bench (58.8%).
High-volume chatQwen3.8 27BLower output list price ($0.4/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5 miniLower TTFT (140 ms).
Long-document RAGGPT-5 miniLarger window (400k).
Screenshots / visionGPT-5 miniGPT-5 mini is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchAug 14, 2026

Qwen3.8 27B (Aug 14): dense enough to self-host, not a frontier MoE

Alibaba open-weight 27B drop. Local/open-weight lists should see it. It will not win frontier-agents.

launchAug 8, 2025

GPT-5 mini: the 2025 distill still useful as a cheap OpenAI baseline

High-volume agents that cannot pay Sol. Compare to Luna before you assume the new cheap SKU wins.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/gpt-5-mini-vs-qwen-3-8-27b/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
OpenAI

GPT-5 mini

Elo 1,410
SWE-bench52.4%
Speed (tok/s)155 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.25/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$2/1M
Alibaba

Qwen3.8 27B

Elo 1,398
SWE-bench58.8%
Speed (tok/s)152 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.1/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.4/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, GPT-5 mini or Qwen3.8 27B?
GPT-5 mini has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,410). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, GPT-5 mini or Qwen3.8 27B?
Qwen3.8 27B leads SWE-bench at 58.8% vs 52.4%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Qwen3.8 27B output tokens are $0.4/1M versus $2/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, GPT-5 mini or Qwen3.8 27B?
GPT-5 mini has the lower time-to-first-token (140 ms vs 140 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5 mini accepts 400k tokens versus 131k.
Can I self-host either model?
Qwen3.8 27B is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. GPT-5 mini and Qwen3.8 27B Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Aug 14, 2026

    Qwen3.8 27B (Aug 14): dense enough to self-host, not a frontier MoE

  • launch · Aug 8, 2025

    GPT-5 mini: the 2025 distill still useful as a cheap OpenAI baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All GPT-5 mini matchups →|All Qwen3.8 27B matchups →
GPT-5 mini vs OpenAI o3-mini (previous gpt-mini)GPT-5 mini vs GPT-5.6 Luna (next gpt-mini)Qwen QwQ 32B vs GPT-5 miniQwen 3 Max vs GPT-5 miniGPT-4.5 Orion vs GPT-5 miniGPT-5.6 Terra vs GPT-5 mini