CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen QwQ 32B

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen QwQ 32B benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, GPT-5.6 Terra delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,548 vs 1,495), while GPT-5.6 Terra leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (70.4%), while Qwen QwQ 32B is more budget-friendly at $1.2/1M per 1M output tokens, while GPT-5.6 Terra provides faster response streaming (128 tok/s). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose GPT-5.6 Terra if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Qwen QwQ 32B if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

10 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

GPT-5.6 Terra (7)Qwen QwQ 32B (3)
GPT-5.6 Terra
7 of 10 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓Coding Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Context window
Qwen QwQ 32B
3 of 10 Wins
✓GPQA Diamond✓Input price✓Output price
OpenAI
Leads 7 of 10 metrics
GPT-5.6 Terra

OpenAI 5.6 mid tier. Official API $2/$12 per 1M after the Jul 30 2026 price cut.

Terra Mid-TierElo 1,548$6/1M out
Alibaba
Leads 3 of 10 metrics
Qwen QwQ 32B

Alibaba specialized open reasoning model competing with frontier closed reasoning models.

QwQ ReasoningElo 1,495$1.2/1M out

GPT-5.6 Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

3 models

Currently comparing GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen QwQ 32B. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.6 Sol$30GPT-5.6 Luna$0.6

Qwen QwQ 32B Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model B

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: High (Max QwQ CoT)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Thinking Delay
960 ms
3× delay
Reasoning Depth
~7,200
Internal tokens
Cost / 1k Calls
$9.15
17.9× standard bill
Accuracy Boost
+11.8% accuracy
STEM & SWE-bench
Top Rival Showdowns for GPT-5.6 Terra
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderGPT-5.6 Terra Wins

GPT-5.6 Terra

Δ 53 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderGPT-5.6 Terra Wins

GPT-5.6 Terra

128 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderQwen QwQ 32B Wins

Qwen QwQ 32B

$1.2 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

GPT-5.6 Terra (7)vsQwen QwQ 32B (3)
GPT-5.6 Terra: 7W (70%)Overall: GPT-5.6 TerraQwen QwQ 32B: 3W (30%)
← GPT-5.6 TerraQwen QwQ 32B →
🏆GPT-5.6 Terra(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
GPT-5.6 TerravsQwen QwQ 32B
Preference Elo
1,548vs1,495+53
Coding Elo
1,542vs1,520+22
SWE-bench
70.4%vs67.5%+2.9%
LiveBench
69.1%vs68%+1.1%
GPQA Diamond
82%vs83.2%+1.2%
GPT-5.6 Terra: 4WQwen QwQ 32B: 1W
🏆GPT-5.6 Terra(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
GPT-5.6 TerravsQwen QwQ 32B
Output speed
128 tok/svs68 tok/s+60 tok/s
Time to first token
160 msvs320 ms+160 ms
GPT-5.6 Terra: 2WQwen QwQ 32B: 0W
🏆Qwen QwQ 32B(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
GPT-5.6 TerravsQwen QwQ 32B
Output price
$6/1Mvs$1.2/1M+$4.8/1M
Input price
$1/1Mvs$0.3/1M+$0.7/1M
Context window
1.1Mvs131k+919k
GPT-5.6 Terra: 1WQwen QwQ 32B: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+53
GPT-5.6 Terra1,548
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
Qwen QwQ 32B1,495
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Coding Elo+22
GPT-5.6 Terra1,542
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
Qwen QwQ 32B1,520
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
LiveBench+1.1%
GPT-5.6 Terra69.1%
livebench · Aug 16, 2026
Qwen QwQ 32B68%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
SWE-bench+2.9%
GPT-5.6 Terra70.4%
swebench · Aug 16, 2026
Qwen QwQ 32B67.5%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
GPQA Diamond+1.2%
GPT-5.6 Terra82%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Qwen QwQ 32B83.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+160 ms
GPT-5.6 Terra160 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Qwen QwQ 32B320 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+60 tok/s
GPT-5.6 Terra128 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Qwen QwQ 32B68 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$0.7/1M
GPT-5.6 Terra$1/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen QwQ 32B$0.3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$4.8/1M
GPT-5.6 Terra$6/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen QwQ 32B$1.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+919k
GPT-5.6 Terra1.1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen QwQ 32B131k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 TerraQwen QwQ 32BAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,548
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
1,495
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
+53
Coding Elo
1,542
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
1,520
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
+22
LiveBench
69.1%
livebench · Aug 16, 2026
68%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
+1.1%
SWE-bench
70.4%
swebench · Aug 16, 2026
67.5%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
+2.9%
GPQA Diamond
82%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
83.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+1.2%
Time to first token
160 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
320 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+160 ms
Output speed
128 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
68 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+60 tok/s
Input price
$1/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.7/1M
Output price
$6/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$1.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$4.8/1M
Context window
1.1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
131k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+919k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 77% with Qwen QwQ 32B
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
GPT-5.6 Terra$125.00 / mo
In: $35Out: $90
Qwen QwQ 32B$28.50 / mo
In: $10.5Out: $18
Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen QwQ 32B is estimated to save $96.50/month ($1,158/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    GPT-5.6 Terra:Pick GPT-5.6 Terra when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Qwen QwQ 32B:Pick Qwen QwQ 32B when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    GPT-5.6 Terra:Pick GPT-5.6 Terra when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGPT-5.6 Terra

Higher SWE-bench (70.4%).

High-volume chatQwen QwQ 32B

Lower output list price ($1.2/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 Terra

Lower TTFT (160 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 Terra

Larger window (1.1M).

Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-5.6 Terra is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGPT-5.6 TerraHigher SWE-bench (70.4%).
High-volume chatQwen QwQ 32BLower output list price ($1.2/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 TerraLower TTFT (160 ms).
Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 TerraLarger window (1.1M).
Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5.6 Terra is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
priceJul 30, 2026

GPT-5.6 Terra after the Jul 30 cut: $2/$12 mid-tier

Terra is OpenAI’s Sonnet-class invoice. Use it when Sol is too expensive and Luna is too small.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/gpt-5-6-terra-vs-qwq-32b/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Terra

Elo 1,548
SWE-bench70.4%
Speed (tok/s)128 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$1/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$6/1M
Alibaba

Qwen QwQ 32B

Elo 1,495
SWE-bench67.5%
Speed (tok/s)68 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1.2/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, GPT-5.6 Terra or Qwen QwQ 32B?
GPT-5.6 Terra has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,548). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, GPT-5.6 Terra or Qwen QwQ 32B?
GPT-5.6 Terra leads SWE-bench at 70.4% vs 67.5%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Qwen QwQ 32B output tokens are $1.2/1M versus $6/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, GPT-5.6 Terra or Qwen QwQ 32B?
GPT-5.6 Terra has the lower time-to-first-token (160 ms vs 320 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5.6 Terra accepts 1.1M tokens versus 131k.
Can I self-host either model?
Qwen QwQ 32B is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. GPT-5.6 Terra and Qwen QwQ 32B Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • price · Jul 30, 2026

    GPT-5.6 Terra after the Jul 30 cut: $2/$12 mid-tier

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All GPT-5.6 Terra matchups →|All Qwen QwQ 32B matchups →
Qwen QwQ 32B vs Qwen3 235B (previous qwen)GPT-4.5 Orion vs GPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5 vs GPT-5.6 TerraQwen 3 Max vs Qwen QwQ 32BGPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI: o3 Mini vs GPT-5.6 Terra