CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. GPT-5.6 Luna vs MiniMax M2.5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

GPT-5.6 Luna vs MiniMax M2.5 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, MiniMax M2.5 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,478 vs 1,466), while MiniMax M2.5 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (75.8%), while GPT-5.6 Luna is more budget-friendly at $1.2/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose MiniMax M2.5 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

GPT-5.6 Luna (4)MiniMax M2.5 (5)
GPT-5.6 Luna
4 of 9 Wins
✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Context window
MiniMax M2.5
5 of 9 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓Coding Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond
OpenAI
Leads 4 of 9 metrics
GPT-5.6 Luna

OpenAI 5.6 fast/cheap tier. Official API $0.20/$1.20 per 1M after the Jul 30 80% Luna cut.

Luna Fast / VolumeElo 1,466$1.2/1M out
MiniMax
Leads 5 of 9 metrics
MiniMax M2.5

MiniMax coding model. Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026.

Elo 1,478$1.2/1M out

GPT-5.6 Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

3 models

Currently comparing GPT-5.6 Luna vs MiniMax M2.5. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Sol$30GPT-5.6 Terra$12
Top Rival Showdowns for GPT-5.6 Luna
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderMiniMax M2.5 Wins

MiniMax M2.5

Δ 12 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderGPT-5.6 Luna Wins

GPT-5.6 Luna

188 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderGPT-5.6 Luna Wins

GPT-5.6 Luna

$1.2 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

GPT-5.6 Luna (4)vsMiniMax M2.5 (5)
GPT-5.6 Luna: 4W (44%)Overall: MiniMax M2.5MiniMax M2.5: 5W (56%)
← GPT-5.6 Luna1 tiesMiniMax M2.5 →
🏆MiniMax M2.5(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
GPT-5.6 LunavsMiniMax M2.5
Preference Elo
1,466vs1,478+12
Coding Elo
1,458vs1,536+78
SWE-bench
61.8%vs75.8%+14%
LiveBench
64.2%vs64.4%+0.2%
GPQA Diamond
75.4%vs76.2%+0.8%
GPT-5.6 Luna: 0WMiniMax M2.5: 5W
🏆GPT-5.6 Luna(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
GPT-5.6 LunavsMiniMax M2.5
Output speed
188 tok/svs90 tok/s+98 tok/s
Time to first token
88 msvs250 ms+162 ms
GPT-5.6 Luna: 2WMiniMax M2.5: 0W
🏆GPT-5.6 Luna(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
GPT-5.6 LunavsMiniMax M2.5
Output price
$1.2/1Mvs$1.2/1M
Input price
$0.2/1Mvs$0.3/1M+$0.1/1M
Context window
1Mvs205k+795k
GPT-5.6 Luna: 2WMiniMax M2.5: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+12
GPT-5.6 Luna1,466
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.51,478
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Coding Elo+78
GPT-5.6 Luna1,458
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.51,536
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
LiveBench+0.2%
GPT-5.6 Luna64.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.564.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
SWE-bench+14%
GPT-5.6 Luna61.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.575.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPQA Diamond+0.8%
GPT-5.6 Luna75.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.576.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+162 ms
GPT-5.6 Luna88 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.5250 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+98 tok/s
GPT-5.6 Luna188 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.590 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$0.1/1M
GPT-5.6 Luna$0.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.5$0.3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price
GPT-5.6 Luna$1.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.5$1.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+795k
GPT-5.6 Luna1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.5205k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaMiniMax M2.5Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,466
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
1,478
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+12
Coding Elo
1,458
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
1,536
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+78
LiveBench
64.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
64.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+0.2%
SWE-bench
61.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
75.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+14%
GPQA Diamond
75.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
76.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+0.8%
Time to first token
88 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
250 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+162 ms
Output speed
188 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
90 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+98 tok/s
Input price
$0.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
$0.3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.1/1M
Output price
$1.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
$1.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Context window
1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
205k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+795k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 12% with GPT-5.6 Luna
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
GPT-5.6 Luna$25.00 / mo
In: $7Out: $18
MiniMax M2.5$28.50 / mo
In: $10.5Out: $18
Estimated Cost Delta

GPT-5.6 Luna is estimated to save $3.50/month ($42/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    MiniMax M2.5:Pick MiniMax M2.5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    GPT-5.6 Luna:Pick GPT-5.6 Luna when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    GPT-5.6 Luna:Pick GPT-5.6 Luna when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsMiniMax M2.5

Higher SWE-bench (75.8%).

High-volume chatGPT-5.6 Luna

Lower output list price ($1.2/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 Luna

Lower TTFT (88 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 Luna

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsMiniMax M2.5Higher SWE-bench (75.8%).
High-volume chatGPT-5.6 LunaLower output list price ($1.2/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 LunaLower TTFT (88 ms).
Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 LunaLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
priceJul 30, 2026

GPT-5.6 Luna’s 80% cut: $0.20/$1.20 for volume chat

Luna is the OpenAI fast/cheap 5.6 SKU after Jul 30. It is not Sol. Sort by price and TTFT, not Elo.

launchFeb 12, 2026

MiniMax M2.5: the Feb 2026 SWE-bench specialist still on the board

Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026. Coding lists should still see it.

launchAug 8, 2025

GPT-5 mini: the 2025 distill still useful as a cheap OpenAI baseline

High-volume agents that cannot pay Sol. Compare to Luna before you assume the new cheap SKU wins.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/gpt-5-6-luna-vs-minimax-m2-5/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna

Elo 1,466
SWE-bench61.8%
Speed (tok/s)188 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.2/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1.2/1M
MiniMax

MiniMax M2.5

Elo 1,478
SWE-bench75.8%
Speed (tok/s)90 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1.2/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, GPT-5.6 Luna or MiniMax M2.5?
MiniMax M2.5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,478). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, GPT-5.6 Luna or MiniMax M2.5?
MiniMax M2.5 leads SWE-bench at 75.8% vs 61.8%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
GPT-5.6 Luna output tokens are $1.2/1M versus $1.2/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, GPT-5.6 Luna or MiniMax M2.5?
GPT-5.6 Luna has the lower time-to-first-token (88 ms vs 250 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5.6 Luna accepts 1M tokens versus 205k.
Can I self-host either model?
MiniMax M2.5 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. GPT-5.6 Luna and MiniMax M2.5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • price · Jul 30, 2026

    GPT-5.6 Luna’s 80% cut: $0.20/$1.20 for volume chat

  • launch · Feb 12, 2026

    MiniMax M2.5: the Feb 2026 SWE-bench specialist still on the board

  • launch · Aug 8, 2025

    GPT-5 mini: the 2025 distill still useful as a cheap OpenAI baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All GPT-5.6 Luna matchups →|All MiniMax M2.5 matchups →
GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-5 mini (previous gpt-mini)GPT-4.5 Orion vs MiniMax M2.5GPT-5.6 Terra vs MiniMax M2.5GPT-5 vs MiniMax M2.5OpenAI o3-mini vs MiniMax M2.5GPT-5.6 Sol vs MiniMax M2.5