CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. GLM-5V Turbo vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

GLM-5V Turbo vs GPT-5.6 Luna benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, GLM-5V Turbo delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,475 vs 1,466), while GLM-5V Turbo leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (65.2%), while GLM-5V Turbo is more budget-friendly at $0.6/1M per 1M output tokens, while GPT-5.6 Luna provides faster response streaming (188 tok/s). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: GLM-5V Turbo holds the advantage over GPT-5.6 Luna in overall benchmark performance and human evaluation rankings. Choose GLM-5V Turbo for demanding workloads, or review the breakdown below to compare coding and pricing metrics.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

10 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

GLM-5V Turbo (6)GPT-5.6 Luna (4)
GLM-5V Turbo
6 of 10 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓Coding Elo✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond✓Input price✓Output price
GPT-5.6 Luna
4 of 10 Wins
✓LiveBench✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Context window
Zhipu
Leads 6 of 10 metrics
GLM-5V Turbo

Zhipu high-throughput multimodal vision model with sub-second latency and competitive coding.

5V TurboElo 1,475$0.6/1M out
OpenAI
Leads 4 of 10 metrics
GPT-5.6 Luna

OpenAI 5.6 fast/cheap tier. Official API $0.20/$1.20 per 1M after the Jul 30 80% Luna cut.

Luna Fast / VolumeElo 1,466$1.2/1M out

GLM-5 Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

3 models

Currently comparing GLM-5V Turbo vs GPT-5.6 Luna. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: GLM-5V Turbo
GLM-5.2$1.8GLM-5.3$1.8
Top Rival Showdowns for GLM-5V Turbo
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference LeaderGLM-5V Turbo Wins

GLM-5V Turbo

Δ 9 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderGPT-5.6 Luna Wins

GPT-5.6 Luna

188 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderGLM-5V Turbo Wins

GLM-5V Turbo

$0.6 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

GLM-5V Turbo (6)vsGPT-5.6 Luna (4)
GLM-5V Turbo: 6W (60%)Overall: GLM-5V TurboGPT-5.6 Luna: 4W (40%)
← GLM-5V TurboGPT-5.6 Luna →
🏆GLM-5V Turbo(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
GLM-5V TurbovsGPT-5.6 Luna
Preference Elo
1,475vs1,466+9
Coding Elo
1,482vs1,458+24
SWE-bench
65.2%vs61.8%+3.4%
LiveBench
63.8%vs64.2%+0.4%
GPQA Diamond
77.4%vs75.4%+2%
GLM-5V Turbo: 4WGPT-5.6 Luna: 1W
🏆GPT-5.6 Luna(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
GLM-5V TurbovsGPT-5.6 Luna
Output speed
112 tok/svs188 tok/s+76 tok/s
Time to first token
180 msvs88 ms+92 ms
GLM-5V Turbo: 0WGPT-5.6 Luna: 2W
🏆GLM-5V Turbo(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
GLM-5V TurbovsGPT-5.6 Luna
Output price
$0.6/1Mvs$1.2/1M+$0.6/1M
Input price
$0.15/1Mvs$0.2/1M+$0.05/1M
Context window
128kvs1M+872k
GLM-5V Turbo: 2WGPT-5.6 Luna: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+9
GLM-5V Turbo1,475
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna1,466
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Coding Elo+24
GLM-5V Turbo1,482
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna1,458
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
LiveBench+0.4%
GLM-5V Turbo63.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna64.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
SWE-bench+3.4%
GLM-5V Turbo65.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna61.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
GPQA Diamond+2%
GLM-5V Turbo77.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna75.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Time to first token+92 ms
GLM-5V Turbo180 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna88 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Output speed+76 tok/s
GLM-5V Turbo112 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna188 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Input price+$0.05/1M
GLM-5V Turbo$0.15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna$0.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Output price+$0.6/1M
GLM-5V Turbo$0.6/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna$1.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Context window+872k
GLM-5V Turbo128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
BenchmarkGLM-5V TurboGPT-5.6 LunaAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,475
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,466
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+9
Coding Elo
1,482
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,458
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+24
LiveBench
63.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
64.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+0.4%
SWE-bench
65.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
61.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+3.4%
GPQA Diamond
77.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
75.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+2%
Time to first token
180 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
88 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+92 ms
Output speed
112 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
188 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+76 tok/s
Input price
$0.15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+$0.05/1M
Output price
$0.6/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$1.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+$0.6/1M
Context window
128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+872k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 43% with GLM-5V Turbo
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
GLM-5V Turbo$14.25 / mo
In: $5.25Out: $9
GPT-5.6 Luna$25.00 / mo
In: $7Out: $18
Estimated Cost Delta

GLM-5V Turbo is estimated to save $10.75/month ($129/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    GLM-5V Turbo:Pick GLM-5V Turbo when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    GPT-5.6 Luna:Pick GPT-5.6 Luna when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    GPT-5.6 Luna:Pick GPT-5.6 Luna for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGLM-5V Turbo

Higher SWE-bench (65.2%).

High-volume chatGLM-5V Turbo

Lower output list price ($0.6/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 Luna

Lower TTFT (88 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 Luna

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGLM-5V Turbo

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GLM-5V Turbo).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGLM-5V TurboHigher SWE-bench (65.2%).
High-volume chatGLM-5V TurboLower output list price ($0.6/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 LunaLower TTFT (88 ms).
Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 LunaLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionGLM-5V TurboBoth accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GLM-5V Turbo).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
priceJul 30, 2026

GPT-5.6 Luna’s 80% cut: $0.20/$1.20 for volume chat

Luna is the OpenAI fast/cheap 5.6 SKU after Jul 30. It is not Sol. Sort by price and TTFT, not Elo.

launchAug 8, 2025

GPT-5 mini: the 2025 distill still useful as a cheap OpenAI baseline

High-volume agents that cannot pay Sol. Compare to Luna before you assume the new cheap SKU wins.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/glm-5v-turbo-vs-gpt-5-6-luna/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Zhipu

GLM-5V Turbo

Elo 1,475
SWE-bench65.2%
Speed (tok/s)112 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.15/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.6/1M
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna

Elo 1,466
SWE-bench61.8%
Speed (tok/s)188 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.2/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1.2/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, GLM-5V Turbo or GPT-5.6 Luna?
GLM-5V Turbo has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,475). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, GLM-5V Turbo or GPT-5.6 Luna?
GLM-5V Turbo leads SWE-bench at 65.2% vs 61.8%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
GLM-5V Turbo output tokens are $0.6/1M versus $1.2/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, GLM-5V Turbo or GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna has the lower time-to-first-token (88 ms vs 180 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5.6 Luna accepts 1M tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
GLM-5V Turbo is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. GLM-5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Luna Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • price · Jul 30, 2026

    GPT-5.6 Luna’s 80% cut: $0.20/$1.20 for volume chat

  • launch · Aug 8, 2025

    GPT-5 mini: the 2025 distill still useful as a cheap OpenAI baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All GLM-5V Turbo matchups →|All GPT-5.6 Luna matchups →
GLM-5V Turbo vs GLM-5.2 (previous glm)GLM-5V Turbo vs GLM-5.3 (next glm)GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-5 mini (previous gpt-mini)GPT-4.5 Orion vs GLM-5V TurboGPT-5.6 Terra vs GLM-5V TurboGPT-5 vs GLM-5V Turbo