Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Reve 2.1 benchmark

Name: Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Reve 2.1 AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Comparing verified benchmark accuracy, speed, and token pricing between Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Reve 2.1. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Share Analysis:

Google

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it). Preview until a second source matches.

Reve

Reve 2.1

State-of-the-art cinematic image synthesis foundation model known for photorealistic lighting and aesthetic composition.

Img Elo 1,325$200/1k imgs

Top Rival Showdowns for Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

All Matchups

Compare vs:vs GPT Image 2 (High)vs FLUX.2 [max]vs Ideogram 4.0 (Quality)vs Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro vs Krea 2 Large

Image Quality Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Generation Speed Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar Leader

No shared data

Unpriced

Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (0)vsReve 2.1 (5)

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B : 0W (0%)Overall: Reve 2.1Reve 2.1: 5W (100%)

← Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B Reve 2.1 →

🏆Reve 2.1(3/3)

Visual Quality & Adherence

Arena Preference Elo, prompt fidelity & typography score

Benchmark

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vsReve 2.1

Image Elo

—vs1,325

Prompt adherence

—vs93%

Text rendering

—vs93.5%

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B : 0WReve 2.1: 3W

🏆Reve 2.1(1/1)

Generation Latency

Time to render full-resolution image snapshot (seconds)

Benchmark

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vsReve 2.1

Generation time

—vs4.5s

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B : 0WReve 2.1: 1W

🏆Reve 2.1(1/1)

Cost Efficiency

API inference cost per 1,000 generated images

Benchmark

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vsReve 2.1

Price per 1k images

—vs$200/1k

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B : 0WReve 2.1: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Image Elo

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B —

Reve 2.11,325

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Generation time

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B —

Reve 2.14.5s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Price per 1k images

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B —

Reve 2.1$200/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Prompt adherence

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B —

Reve 2.193%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Text rendering

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B —

Reve 2.193.5%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Benchmark	Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B	Reve 2.1	Advantage Delta
Image Elo	—	1,325 seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—
Generation time	—	4.5s seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—
Price per 1k images	—	$200/1k seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—
Prompt adherence	—	93% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—
Text rendering	—	93.5% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—

Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 100% with Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Monthly Image Production Volume25k images / month (25000 imgs)

Quick Presets:

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B $0.00 / mo

Rate: $0/1k

Reve 2.1$5,000.00 / mo

Rate: $200/1k

Estimated Cost Delta

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is estimated to save $5,000.00/month ($60,000/year).

Based on 25k images generated

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visionReve 2.1

Reve 2.1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	Reve 2.1	Reve 2.1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it-vs-reve-2-1/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK

Google

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)262k

Input / 1M Tokens$0.07/1M

Output / 1M Tokens$0.34/1M

Reve

Reve 2.1

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)—

Input / 1M Tokens$200/1k

Output / 1M Tokens$200/1k

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Reve 2.1?: We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Reve 2.1?: SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: List prices are missing for at least one model.
Which is faster, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Reve 2.1?: We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?: Context window is missing for at least one model.
Can I self-host either model?: Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Reve 2.1 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B matchups →|All Reve 2.1 matchups →

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) vs Reve 2.1 Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Reve 2.1 Nano Banana 2 Lite vs Reve 2.1 GPT Image 2 (High) vs Reve 2.1 FLUX.2 [max] vs Reve 2.1 FLUX.2 [flex] vs Reve 2.1

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Image Elo

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B —

Reve 2.11,325

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Generation time

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B —

Reve 2.14.5s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Price per 1k images

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B —

Reve 2.1$200/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Prompt adherence

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B —

Reve 2.193%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Text rendering

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B —

Reve 2.193.5%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Benchmark

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Reve 2.1

Advantage Delta

Image Elo

—

1,325

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

Generation time

—

4.5s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

Price per 1k images

—

$200/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

Prompt adherence

—

93%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

Text rendering

—

93.5%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visionReve 2.1

Reve 2.1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	Reve 2.1	Reve 2.1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Reve 2.1?

We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.

Which is better at coding, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Reve 2.1?

SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

List prices are missing for at least one model.

Which is faster, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Reve 2.1?

We do not have TTFT for both models.

Which has the larger context window?

Context window is missing for at least one model.

Can I self-host either model?

Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Reve 2.1 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.