CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) vs OpenAI o1-mini

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) vs OpenAI o1-mini benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) is more budget-friendly at $0/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) and OpenAI o1-mini present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

3 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) (3)OpenAI o1-mini (0)
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)
3 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
OpenAI o1-mini
0 of 3 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Google
Leads 3 of 3 metrics
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it:free). Preview until a second source matches.

$0/1M out
OpenAI
OpenAI o1-mini

OpenAI high-speed, cost-effective reasoning model optimized for STEM, math, and code generation.

Elo 1,445$4.4/1M out
Top Rival Showdowns for Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) Wins

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)

$0 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) (3)vsOpenAI o1-mini (7)
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free): 3W (30%)Overall: OpenAI o1-miniOpenAI o1-mini: 7W (70%)
← Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)OpenAI o1-mini →
🏆OpenAI o1-mini(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)vsOpenAI o1-mini
Preference Elo
—vs1,445
Coding Elo
—vs1,468
SWE-bench
—vs56.4%
LiveBench
—vs62%
GPQA Diamond
—vs76.8%
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free): 0WOpenAI o1-mini: 5W
🏆OpenAI o1-mini(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)vsOpenAI o1-mini
Output speed
—vs85 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs280 ms
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free): 0WOpenAI o1-mini: 2W
🏆Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)vsOpenAI o1-mini
Output price
$0/1Mvs$4.4/1M+$4.4/1M
Input price
$0/1Mvs$1.1/1M+$1.1/1M
Context window
262kvs128k+134k
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free): 3WOpenAI o1-mini: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
OpenAI o1-mini1,445
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Coding Elo
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
OpenAI o1-mini1,468
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
LiveBench
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
OpenAI o1-mini62%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
SWE-bench
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
OpenAI o1-mini56.4%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
GPQA Diamond
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
OpenAI o1-mini76.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
OpenAI o1-mini280 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
OpenAI o1-mini85 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$1.1/1M
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)$0/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
OpenAI o1-mini$1.1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$4.4/1M
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)$0/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
OpenAI o1-mini$4.4/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+134k
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)262k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
OpenAI o1-mini128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)OpenAI o1-miniAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo—
1,445
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
Coding Elo—
1,468
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
LiveBench—
62%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
SWE-bench—
56.4%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
GPQA Diamond—
76.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Time to first token—
280 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Output speed—
85 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Input price
$0/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$1.1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$1.1/1M
Output price
$0/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$4.4/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$4.4/1M
Context window
262k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+134k

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free):Pick Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)

Lower output list price ($0/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)

Larger window (262k).

Screenshots / visionOpenAI o1-mini

OpenAI o1-mini is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)Lower output list price ($0/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)Larger window (262k).
Screenshots / visionOpenAI o1-miniOpenAI o1-mini is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it-free-vs-o1-mini/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Google

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)262k
Input / 1M Tokens$0/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0/1M
OpenAI

OpenAI o1-mini

Elo 1,445
SWE-bench56.4%
Speed (tok/s)85 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$1.1/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$4.4/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) or OpenAI o1-mini?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) or OpenAI o1-mini?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) output tokens are $0/1M versus $4.4/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) or OpenAI o1-mini?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) accepts 262k tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) and OpenAI o1-mini Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) matchups →|All OpenAI o1-mini matchups →
OpenAI o1-mini vs GPT-4o mini (previous gpt-mini)OpenAI o1-mini vs OpenAI: o3 Mini (next gpt-mini)GPT-5 vs OpenAI o1-miniGemini 3 Pro vs OpenAI o1-miniGemini 3 Flash vs OpenAI o1-miniGPT-4.5 Orion vs OpenAI o1-mini