CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) benchmark

Comparing verified benchmark accuracy, speed, and token pricing between Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit
Google
Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (google/gemini-3-pro-image). Preview until a second source matches.

Google
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Google high-speed multimodal generative model delivering top Elo performance at half the latency and cost of Pro.

Flash ImageImg Elo 1,323$67/1k imgs
Top Rival Showdowns for Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT Image 2 (High)vs Reve 2.1vs FLUX.2 [max]vs Ideogram 4.0 (Quality)vs Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro
Image Quality Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Generation Speed Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar Leader

No shared data

Unpriced

Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) (0)vsNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (5)
Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image): 0W (0%)Overall: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 5W (100%)
← Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) →
🏆Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)(3/3)

Visual Quality & Adherence

Arena Preference Elo, prompt fidelity & typography score

Benchmark
Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)vsNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Image Elo
—vs1,323
Prompt adherence
—vs93.8%
Text rendering
—vs94.2%
Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image): 0WNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 3W
🏆Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)(1/1)

Generation Latency

Time to render full-resolution image snapshot (seconds)

Benchmark
Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)vsNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Generation time
—vs2.5s
Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image): 0WNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 1W
🏆Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)(1/1)

Cost Efficiency

API inference cost per 1,000 generated images

Benchmark
Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)vsNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Price per 1k images
—vs$67/1k
Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image): 0WNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Image Elo
Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)—
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)1,323
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Generation time
Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)—
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)2.5s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Price per 1k images
Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)—
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)$67/1k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Prompt adherence
Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)—
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)93.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Text rendering
Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)—
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)94.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkGoogle: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Advantage Delta
Image Elo—
1,323
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Generation time—
2.5s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Price per 1k images—
$67/1k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Prompt adherence—
93.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Text rendering—
94.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 100% with Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
Monthly Image Production Volume25k images / month (25000 imgs)
Quick Presets:
Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)$0.00 / mo
Rate: $0/1k
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)$1,675.00 / mo
Rate: $67/1k
Estimated Cost Delta

Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) is estimated to save $1,675.00/month ($20,100/year).

Based on 25k images generated

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visionNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatinsufficient dataNeed list prices.
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGinsufficient dataNeed context sizes.
Screenshots / visionNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/gemini-3-pro-image-vs-nano-banana-2/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Google

Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)131k
Input / 1M Tokens$2/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$12/1M
Google

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)—
Input / 1M Tokens$67/1k
Output / 1M Tokens$67/1k

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) or Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) or Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
List prices are missing for at least one model.
Which is faster, Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) or Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Context window is missing for at least one model.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) matchups →|All Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) matchups →
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) (previous nano-banana)Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Nano Banana 2 Lite (next nano-banana)GPT Image 2 (High) vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Reve 2.1 vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)FLUX.2 [max] vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)FLUX.2 [flex] vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)