CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Kimi K3

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Kimi K3 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Kimi K3 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,528 vs 1,506), while Kimi K3 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (73.8%), while Gemini 3.6 Flash is more budget-friendly at $3.75/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Kimi K3 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Gemini 3.6 Flash (4)Kimi K3 (5)
Gemini 3.6 Flash
4 of 9 Wins
✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price
Kimi K3
5 of 9 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓Coding Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond
Google
Leads 4 of 9 metrics
Gemini 3.6 Flash

Google Jul 21 workhorse. Now shares the 3.7 Flash introductory $0.75/$3.75 rate through Dec 31 2026.

3.6 FlashElo 1,506$3.75/1M out
Moonshot
Leads 5 of 9 metrics
Kimi K3

Moonshot AI frontier flagship reasoning and agent swarm model with 256k context and top-tier SWE-bench coding capability.

Elo 1,528$15/1M out

Gemini 3 Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

5 models

Currently comparing Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Kimi K3. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: Gemini 3.6 Flash
Gemini 3 Pro$5Gemini 3 Flash$3Gemini 3.6 Pro$5Gemini 3.7 Flash$1.88

Kimi K3 Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model B

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (Deep Reasoning)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Thinking Delay
290 ms
Standard speed
Reasoning Depth
~2,500
Internal tokens
Cost / 1k Calls
$43.50
7.3× standard bill
Accuracy Boost
+5.5% accuracy
STEM & SWE-bench
Top Rival Showdowns for Gemini 3.6 Flash
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderKimi K3 Wins

Kimi K3

Δ 22 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderGemini 3.6 Flash Wins

Gemini 3.6 Flash

198 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderGemini 3.6 Flash Wins

Gemini 3.6 Flash

$3.75 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Gemini 3.6 Flash (4)vsKimi K3 (5)
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 4W (44%)Overall: Kimi K3Kimi K3: 5W (56%)
← Gemini 3.6 Flash1 tiesKimi K3 →
🏆Kimi K3(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Gemini 3.6 FlashvsKimi K3
Preference Elo
1,506vs1,528+22
Coding Elo
1,514vs1,535+21
SWE-bench
70.8%vs73.8%+3%
LiveBench
67.2%vs69.5%+2.3%
GPQA Diamond
79.6%vs88.4%+8.8%
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 0WKimi K3: 5W
🏆Gemini 3.6 Flash(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Gemini 3.6 FlashvsKimi K3
Output speed
198 tok/svs68 tok/s+130 tok/s
Time to first token
92 msvs290 ms+198 ms
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2WKimi K3: 0W
🏆Gemini 3.6 Flash(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Gemini 3.6 FlashvsKimi K3
Output price
$3.75/1Mvs$15/1M+$11.25/1M
Input price
$0.75/1Mvs$3/1M+$2.25/1M
Context window
1Mvs1M
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2WKimi K3: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+22
Gemini 3.6 Flash1,506
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
Kimi K31,528
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Coding Elo+21
Gemini 3.6 Flash1,514
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
Kimi K31,535
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
LiveBench+2.3%
Gemini 3.6 Flash67.2%
livebench · Aug 16, 2026
Kimi K369.5%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
SWE-bench+3%
Gemini 3.6 Flash70.8%
swebench · Aug 16, 2026
Kimi K373.8%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
GPQA Diamond+8.8%
Gemini 3.6 Flash79.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Kimi K388.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+198 ms
Gemini 3.6 Flash92 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Kimi K3290 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+130 tok/s
Gemini 3.6 Flash198 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Kimi K368 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$2.25/1M
Gemini 3.6 Flash$0.75/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Kimi K3$3/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Output price+$11.25/1M
Gemini 3.6 Flash$3.75/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Kimi K3$15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Context window
Gemini 3.6 Flash1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Kimi K31M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashKimi K3Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,506
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
1,528
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
+22
Coding Elo
1,514
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
1,535
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
+21
LiveBench
67.2%
livebench · Aug 16, 2026
69.5%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
+2.3%
SWE-bench
70.8%
swebench · Aug 16, 2026
73.8%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
+3%
GPQA Diamond
79.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
88.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+8.8%
Time to first token
92 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
290 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+198 ms
Output speed
198 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
68 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+130 tok/s
Input price
$0.75/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$3/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$2.25/1M
Output price
$3.75/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$11.25/1M
Context window
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
—
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 75% with Gemini 3.6 Flash
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Gemini 3.6 Flash$82.50 / mo
In: $26.25Out: $56.25
Kimi K3$330.00 / mo
In: $105Out: $225
Estimated Cost Delta

Gemini 3.6 Flash is estimated to save $247.50/month ($2,970/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Kimi K3:Pick Kimi K3 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Gemini 3.6 Flash:Pick Gemini 3.6 Flash when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Gemini 3.6 Flash:Pick Gemini 3.6 Flash when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsKimi K3

Higher SWE-bench (73.8%).

High-volume chatGemini 3.6 Flash

Lower output list price ($3.75/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3.6 Flash

Lower TTFT (92 ms).

Long-document RAGGemini 3.6 Flash

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionKimi K3

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Kimi K3).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsKimi K3Higher SWE-bench (73.8%).
High-volume chatGemini 3.6 FlashLower output list price ($3.75/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3.6 FlashLower TTFT (92 ms).
Long-document RAGGemini 3.6 FlashLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionKimi K3Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Kimi K3).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
priceAug 13, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate

Jul 21 workhorse that inherited $0.75/$3.75 through year-end. Keep the row; 3.7 is the newer sibling.

launchJun 8, 2026

Kimi K3: Moonshot’s long-context open-weight competitive row

Jun 2026. The Kimi vs GPT hub remaps to the top Moonshot Elo vs top OpenAI Elo.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/gemini-3-6-flash-vs-kimi-k3/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Elo 1,506
SWE-bench70.8%
Speed (tok/s)198 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.75/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$3.75/1M
Moonshot

Kimi K3

Elo 1,528
SWE-bench73.8%
Speed (tok/s)68 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$15/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,528). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 leads SWE-bench at 73.8% vs 70.8%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Gemini 3.6 Flash output tokens are $3.75/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Kimi K3?
Gemini 3.6 Flash has the lower time-to-first-token (92 ms vs 290 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts 1M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Gemini 3.6 Flash and Kimi K3 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • price · Aug 13, 2026

    Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate

  • launch · Jun 8, 2026

    Kimi K3: Moonshot’s long-context open-weight competitive row

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Gemini 3.6 Flash matchups →|All Kimi K3 matchups →
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3 Flash (previous gemini-flash)Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 Flash (next gemini-flash)Kimi K3 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 (previous kimi)Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Gemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3.7 Flash vs Kimi K3Gemini 3 Pro vs Kimi K3