Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Kimi Chat 1.5 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,420 vs 1,295), while Kimi Chat 1.5 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (51%), while Gemini 2.5 Flash is more budget-friendly at $0.4/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
Previous Google speed workhorse.
Moonshot ultra-long context model supporting up to 2 million tokens per request.
Currently comparing Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Kimi Chat 1.5. Alternative family tiers available.
Δ 125 Arena Elo pts
185 tok/s
$0.4 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Kimi Chat 1.5 | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +125 | ||
| Coding Elo | — | — | |
| LiveBench | +6.6% | ||
| SWE-bench | +3% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +3.3% | ||
| Time to first token | +100 ms | ||
| Output speed | 185 tok/s | 95 tok/s | +90 tok/s |
| Input price | $0.1/1M | $0.2/1M | +$0.1/1M |
| Output price | $0.4/1M | $0.8/1M | +$0.4/1M |
| Context window | +1M |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Gemini 2.5 Flash is estimated to save $9.50/month ($114/year).
Higher SWE-bench (51%).
Lower output list price ($0.4/1M).
Lower TTFT (110 ms).
Larger window (2M).
Gemini 2.5 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Kimi Chat 1.5 | Higher SWE-bench (51%). |
| High-volume chat | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Lower output list price ($0.4/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Lower TTFT (110 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Kimi Chat 1.5 | Larger window (2M). |
| Screenshots / vision | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Gemini 2.5 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/gemini-2-5-flash-vs-kimi-1-5-long/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry