Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Ernie 4.5 Turbo delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,450 vs 1,420), while Ernie 4.5 Turbo leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (57%), while Kimi Chat 1.5 is more budget-friendly at $0.8/1M per 1M output tokens, while Ernie 4.5 Turbo provides faster response streaming (95 tok/s). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
Baidu current multimodal enterprise foundation model with broad Chinese knowledge.
Moonshot ultra-long context model supporting up to 2 million tokens per request.
Δ 30 Arena Elo pts
95 tok/s
$0.8 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Ernie 4.5 Turbo | Kimi Chat 1.5 | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +30 | ||
| Coding Elo | +45 | ||
| LiveBench | +3% | ||
| SWE-bench | +6% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +3% | ||
| Time to first token | +10 ms | ||
| Output speed | 95 tok/s | 95 tok/s | — |
| Input price | $0.3/1M | $0.2/1M | +$0.1/1M |
| Output price | $1.2/1M | $0.8/1M | +$0.4/1M |
| Context window | +1.9M |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Kimi Chat 1.5 is estimated to save $9.50/month ($114/year).
Higher SWE-bench (57%).
Lower output list price ($0.8/1M).
Lower TTFT (200 ms).
Larger window (2M).
Ernie 4.5 Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Ernie 4.5 Turbo | Higher SWE-bench (57%). |
| High-volume chat | Kimi Chat 1.5 | Lower output list price ($0.8/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Ernie 4.5 Turbo | Lower TTFT (200 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Kimi Chat 1.5 | Larger window (2M). |
| Screenshots / vision | Ernie 4.5 Turbo | Ernie 4.5 Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/ernie-4-5-vs-kimi-1-5-long/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry
