Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, DeepSeek V4 Flash delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,490 vs 1,360), while DeepSeek V4 Flash leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (71.2%), while Doubao Lite 1.5 is more budget-friendly at $0.1/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
10 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
DeepSeek Jul 31 2026 price-performance SKU. Public listings put it near $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.
ByteDance high-speed lightweight model priced at sub-cent levels.
Currently comparing DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Doubao Lite 1.5. Alternative family tiers available.
Δ 130 Arena Elo pts
180 tok/s
$0.1 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Doubao Lite 1.5 | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +130 | ||
| Coding Elo | +196 | ||
| LiveBench | +13.8% | ||
| SWE-bench | +25.2% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +17.4% | ||
| Time to first token | +55 ms | ||
| Output speed | 142 tok/s | 180 tok/s | +38 tok/s |
| Input price | $0.14/1M | $0.04/1M | +$0.1/1M |
| Output price | $0.28/1M | $0.1/1M | +$0.18/1M |
| Context window | +127k |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Doubao Lite 1.5 is estimated to save $6.20/month ($74/year).
Higher SWE-bench (71.2%).
Lower output list price ($0.1/1M).
Lower TTFT (110 ms).
Larger window (160k).
DeepSeek V4 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Higher SWE-bench (71.2%). |
| High-volume chat | Doubao Lite 1.5 | Lower output list price ($0.1/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Doubao Lite 1.5 | Lower TTFT (110 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Larger window (160k). |
| Screenshots / vision | DeepSeek V4 Flash | DeepSeek V4 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vs-doubao-1-5-lite/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry
