CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. DeepSeek V3 vs OpenAI o3-mini

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026

DeepSeek V3 vs OpenAI o3-mini benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, OpenAI o3-mini delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,560 vs 1,310), while OpenAI o3-mini leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (78.5%), while DeepSeek V3 is more budget-friendly at $1.1/1M per 1M output tokens, while OpenAI o3-mini provides faster response streaming (92 tok/s). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose OpenAI o3-mini if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose DeepSeek V3 if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

DeepSeek V3 (2)OpenAI o3-mini (7)
DeepSeek V3
2 of 9 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price
OpenAI o3-mini
7 of 9 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Context window
DeepSeek
Leads 2 of 9 metrics
DeepSeek V3

Prior DeepSeek flagship. Baseline for v3 vs v4.

Elo 1,310$1.1/1M out
OpenAI
Leads 7 of 9 metrics
OpenAI o3-mini

OpenAI cost-efficient reasoning model with adjustable thinking effort and top coding benchmark scores.

o3-miniElo 1,560$4.4/1M out

OpenAI o3-mini Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model B

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (Standard)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Thinking Delay
290 ms
Standard speed
Reasoning Depth
~1,500
Internal tokens
Cost / 1k Calls
$8.47
4.5× standard bill
Accuracy Boost
+4.5% accuracy
STEM & SWE-bench
Top Rival Showdowns for DeepSeek V3
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderOpenAI o3-mini Wins

OpenAI o3-mini

Δ 250 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderOpenAI o3-mini Wins

OpenAI o3-mini

92 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderDeepSeek V3 Wins

DeepSeek V3

$1.1 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

DeepSeek V3 (2)vsOpenAI o3-mini (8)
DeepSeek V3: 2W (20%)Overall: OpenAI o3-miniOpenAI o3-mini: 8W (80%)
← DeepSeek V3OpenAI o3-mini →
🏆OpenAI o3-mini(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
DeepSeek V3vsOpenAI o3-mini
Preference Elo
1,310vs1,560+250
Coding Elo
—vs1,585
SWE-bench
48.6%vs78.5%+29.9%
LiveBench
55.4%vs72.4%+17%
GPQA Diamond
59.1%vs87.2%+28.1%
DeepSeek V3: 0WOpenAI o3-mini: 5W
🏆OpenAI o3-mini(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
DeepSeek V3vsOpenAI o3-mini
Output speed
66 tok/svs92 tok/s+26 tok/s
Time to first token
380 msvs290 ms+90 ms
DeepSeek V3: 0WOpenAI o3-mini: 2W
🏆DeepSeek V3(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
DeepSeek V3vsOpenAI o3-mini
Output price
$1.1/1Mvs$4.4/1M+$3.3/1M
Input price
$0.27/1Mvs$1.1/1M+$0.83/1M
Context window
128kvs200k+72k
DeepSeek V3: 2WOpenAI o3-mini: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+250
DeepSeek V31,310
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o3-mini1,560
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Coding Elo
DeepSeek V3—
OpenAI o3-mini1,585
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
LiveBench+17%
DeepSeek V355.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o3-mini72.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
SWE-bench+29.9%
DeepSeek V348.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o3-mini78.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPQA Diamond+28.1%
DeepSeek V359.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o3-mini87.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+90 ms
DeepSeek V3380 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o3-mini290 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+26 tok/s
DeepSeek V366 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o3-mini92 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$0.83/1M
DeepSeek V3$0.27/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o3-mini$1.1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$3.3/1M
DeepSeek V3$1.1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o3-mini$4.4/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+72k
DeepSeek V3128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o3-mini200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3OpenAI o3-miniAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,310
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,560
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+250
Coding Elo—
1,585
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
LiveBench
55.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
72.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+17%
SWE-bench
48.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
78.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+29.9%
GPQA Diamond
59.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
87.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+28.1%
Time to first token
380 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
290 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+90 ms
Output speed
66 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
92 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+26 tok/s
Input price
$0.27/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$1.1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.83/1M
Output price
$1.1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$4.4/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$3.3/1M
Context window
128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+72k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 75% with DeepSeek V3
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
DeepSeek V3$25.95 / mo
In: $9.45Out: $16.5
OpenAI o3-mini$104.50 / mo
In: $38.5Out: $66
Estimated Cost Delta

DeepSeek V3 is estimated to save $78.55/month ($943/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    OpenAI o3-mini:Pick OpenAI o3-mini when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    DeepSeek V3:Pick DeepSeek V3 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    OpenAI o3-mini:Pick OpenAI o3-mini when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsOpenAI o3-mini

Higher SWE-bench (78.5%).

High-volume chatDeepSeek V3

Lower output list price ($1.1/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIOpenAI o3-mini

Lower TTFT (290 ms).

Long-document RAGOpenAI o3-mini

Larger window (200k).

Screenshots / visionOpenAI o3-mini

OpenAI o3-mini is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsOpenAI o3-miniHigher SWE-bench (78.5%).
High-volume chatDeepSeek V3Lower output list price ($1.1/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIOpenAI o3-miniLower TTFT (290 ms).
Long-document RAGOpenAI o3-miniLarger window (200k).
Screenshots / visionOpenAI o3-miniOpenAI o3-mini is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/deepseek-v3-vs-o3-mini/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3

Elo 1,310
SWE-bench48.6%
Speed (tok/s)66 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.27/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1.1/1M
OpenAI

OpenAI o3-mini

Elo 1,560
SWE-bench78.5%
Speed (tok/s)92 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$1.1/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$4.4/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek V3 or OpenAI o3-mini?
OpenAI o3-mini has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,560). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, DeepSeek V3 or OpenAI o3-mini?
OpenAI o3-mini leads SWE-bench at 78.5% vs 48.6%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
DeepSeek V3 output tokens are $1.1/1M versus $4.4/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, DeepSeek V3 or OpenAI o3-mini?
OpenAI o3-mini has the lower time-to-first-token (290 ms vs 380 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
OpenAI o3-mini accepts 200k tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
DeepSeek V3 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek V3 and OpenAI o3-mini Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All DeepSeek V3 matchups →|All OpenAI o3-mini matchups →
DeepSeek V3 vs DeepSeek Coder V2 (previous deepseek)DeepSeek V3 vs DeepSeek R1 (next deepseek)OpenAI o3-mini vs OpenAI o1-mini (previous gpt-mini)OpenAI o3-mini vs GPT-5 mini (next gpt-mini)GPT-5 vs OpenAI o3-miniDeepSeek V4 Pro vs OpenAI o3-mini