CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. DeepSeek Coder V2 vs OpenAI o1

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026

DeepSeek Coder V2 vs OpenAI o1 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, OpenAI o1 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,512 vs 1,365), while DeepSeek Coder V2 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (60.5%), while DeepSeek Coder V2 is more budget-friendly at $0.28/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose OpenAI o1 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose DeepSeek Coder V2 if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

10 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

DeepSeek Coder V2 (5)OpenAI o1 (5)
DeepSeek Coder V2
5 of 10 Wins
✓SWE-bench✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price
OpenAI o1
5 of 10 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓Coding Elo✓LiveBench✓GPQA Diamond✓Context window
DeepSeek
Leads 5 of 10 metrics
DeepSeek Coder V2

DeepSeek open-weight Mixture-of-Experts coding model supporting 338 programming languages and 128k context.

Elo 1,365$0.28/1M out
OpenAI
Leads 5 of 10 metrics
OpenAI o1

OpenAI pioneer reasoning foundation model designed for complex science, math, and multi-step reasoning.

Elo 1,512$60/1M out

OpenAI o1 Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model B

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (Standard)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Thinking Delay
420 ms
Standard speed
Reasoning Depth
~1,500
Internal tokens
Cost / 1k Calls
$115.50
4.5× standard bill
Accuracy Boost
+4.5% accuracy
STEM & SWE-bench
Top Rival Showdowns for DeepSeek Coder V2
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderOpenAI o1 Wins

OpenAI o1

Δ 147 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderDeepSeek Coder V2 Wins

DeepSeek Coder V2

75 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderDeepSeek Coder V2 Wins

DeepSeek Coder V2

$0.28 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

DeepSeek Coder V2 (5)vsOpenAI o1 (5)
DeepSeek Coder V2: 5W (50%)Overall: Even matchupOpenAI o1: 5W (50%)
← DeepSeek Coder V2OpenAI o1 →
🏆OpenAI o1(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
DeepSeek Coder V2vsOpenAI o1
Preference Elo
1,365vs1,512+147
Coding Elo
1,442vs1,485+43
SWE-bench
60.5%vs48.9%+11.6%
LiveBench
58.6%vs65.4%+6.8%
GPQA Diamond
70.2%vs78%+7.8%
DeepSeek Coder V2: 1WOpenAI o1: 4W
🏆DeepSeek Coder V2(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
DeepSeek Coder V2vsOpenAI o1
Output speed
75 tok/svs45 tok/s+30 tok/s
Time to first token
290 msvs420 ms+130 ms
DeepSeek Coder V2: 2WOpenAI o1: 0W
🏆DeepSeek Coder V2(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
DeepSeek Coder V2vsOpenAI o1
Output price
$0.28/1Mvs$60/1M+$59.72/1M
Input price
$0.14/1Mvs$15/1M+$14.86/1M
Context window
128kvs200k+72k
DeepSeek Coder V2: 2WOpenAI o1: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+147
DeepSeek Coder V21,365
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o11,512
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Coding Elo+43
DeepSeek Coder V21,442
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o11,485
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
LiveBench+6.8%
DeepSeek Coder V258.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o165.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
SWE-bench+11.6%
DeepSeek Coder V260.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o148.9%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPQA Diamond+7.8%
DeepSeek Coder V270.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o178%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+130 ms
DeepSeek Coder V2290 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o1420 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+30 tok/s
DeepSeek Coder V275 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o145 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$14.86/1M
DeepSeek Coder V2$0.14/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o1$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$59.72/1M
DeepSeek Coder V2$0.28/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o1$60/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+72k
DeepSeek Coder V2128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o1200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder V2OpenAI o1Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,365
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,512
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+147
Coding Elo
1,442
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,485
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+43
LiveBench
58.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
65.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+6.8%
SWE-bench
60.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
48.9%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+11.6%
GPQA Diamond
70.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
78%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+7.8%
Time to first token
290 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
420 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+130 ms
Output speed
75 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
45 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+30 tok/s
Input price
$0.14/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$14.86/1M
Output price
$0.28/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$60/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$59.72/1M
Context window
128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+72k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 99% with DeepSeek Coder V2
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
DeepSeek Coder V2$9.10 / mo
In: $4.9Out: $4.2
OpenAI o1$1,425.00 / mo
In: $525Out: $900
Estimated Cost Delta

DeepSeek Coder V2 is estimated to save $1,415.90/month ($16,991/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    DeepSeek Coder V2:Pick DeepSeek Coder V2 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    DeepSeek Coder V2:Pick DeepSeek Coder V2 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    OpenAI o1:Pick OpenAI o1 as the default general assistant.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsDeepSeek Coder V2

Higher SWE-bench (60.5%).

High-volume chatDeepSeek Coder V2

Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIDeepSeek Coder V2

Lower TTFT (290 ms).

Long-document RAGOpenAI o1

Larger window (200k).

Screenshots / visionOpenAI o1

OpenAI o1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsDeepSeek Coder V2Higher SWE-bench (60.5%).
High-volume chatDeepSeek Coder V2Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIDeepSeek Coder V2Lower TTFT (290 ms).
Long-document RAGOpenAI o1Larger window (200k).
Screenshots / visionOpenAI o1OpenAI o1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-o1/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek Coder V2

Elo 1,365
SWE-bench60.5%
Speed (tok/s)75 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.14/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.28/1M
OpenAI

OpenAI o1

Elo 1,512
SWE-bench48.9%
Speed (tok/s)45 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$15/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$60/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek Coder V2 or OpenAI o1?
OpenAI o1 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,512). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, DeepSeek Coder V2 or OpenAI o1?
DeepSeek Coder V2 leads SWE-bench at 60.5% vs 48.9%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
DeepSeek Coder V2 output tokens are $0.28/1M versus $60/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, DeepSeek Coder V2 or OpenAI o1?
DeepSeek Coder V2 has the lower time-to-first-token (290 ms vs 420 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
OpenAI o1 accepts 200k tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
DeepSeek Coder V2 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek Coder V2 and OpenAI o1 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All DeepSeek Coder V2 matchups →|All OpenAI o1 matchups →
DeepSeek Coder V2 vs DeepSeek V3 (next deepseek)OpenAI o1 vs GPT-4o (previous gpt-flagship)OpenAI o1 vs GPT-4.5 Orion (next gpt-flagship)DeepSeek V4 Flash vs OpenAI o1GPT-5 vs OpenAI o1DeepSeek V4 Pro vs OpenAI o1