Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, DeepSeek R1 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,358 vs 1,320), while DeepSeek R1 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (65.2%), while Codestral 25.01 is more budget-friendly at $0.9/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
Mistral code-specialist model.
Open-weights reasoning model trained with large-scale RL.
Currently comparing Codestral 25.01 vs DeepSeek R1. Alternative family tiers available.
Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost
Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.
Δ 38 Arena Elo pts
148 tok/s
$0.9 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Codestral 25.01 | DeepSeek R1 | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +38 | ||
| Coding Elo | — | — | |
| LiveBench | +5% | ||
| SWE-bench | +13.4% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +21.4% | ||
| Time to first token | +270 ms | ||
| Output speed | 148 tok/s | 62 tok/s | +86 tok/s |
| Input price | $0.3/1M | $0.55/1M | +$0.25/1M |
| Output price | $0.9/1M | $2.19/1M | +$1.29/1M |
| Context window | +128k |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Codestral 25.01 is estimated to save $28.10/month ($337/year).
Higher SWE-bench (65.2%).
Lower output list price ($0.9/1M).
Lower TTFT (150 ms).
Larger window (256k).
DeepSeek R1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | DeepSeek R1 | Higher SWE-bench (65.2%). |
| High-volume chat | Codestral 25.01 | Lower output list price ($0.9/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Codestral 25.01 | Lower TTFT (150 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Codestral 25.01 | Larger window (256k). |
| Screenshots / vision | DeepSeek R1 | DeepSeek R1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/codestral-25-vs-deepseek-r1/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry