Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, MiniMax M2.5 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,478 vs 1,455), while MiniMax M2.5 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (75.8%), while MiniMax M2.5 is more budget-friendly at $1.2/1M per 1M output tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4 provides faster response streaming (92 tok/s). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
10 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
First Sonnet 4 generation. Bridge between 3.5/3.7 and Sonnet 5.
MiniMax coding model. Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026.
Δ 23 Arena Elo pts
92 tok/s
$1.2 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | MiniMax M2.5 | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +23 | ||
| Coding Elo | +68 | ||
| LiveBench | +1.2% | ||
| SWE-bench | +13% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +0.2% | ||
| Time to first token | +30 ms | ||
| Output speed | 92 tok/s | 90 tok/s | +2 tok/s |
| Input price | $0.3/1M | +$2.7/1M | |
| Output price | $1.2/1M | +$13.8/1M | |
| Context window | +5k |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
MiniMax M2.5 is estimated to save $301.50/month ($3,618/year).
Higher SWE-bench (75.8%).
Lower output list price ($1.2/1M).
Lower TTFT (220 ms).
Larger window (205k).
Claude Sonnet 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | MiniMax M2.5 | Higher SWE-bench (75.8%). |
| High-volume chat | MiniMax M2.5 | Lower output list price ($1.2/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Claude Sonnet 4 | Lower TTFT (220 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | MiniMax M2.5 | Larger window (205k). |
| Screenshots / vision | Claude Sonnet 4 | Claude Sonnet 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-sonnet-4-vs-minimax-m2-5/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry