Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Claude Sonnet 4 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,455 vs 1,240), while Claude Sonnet 4 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (62.8%), while Llama 3.1 70B is more budget-friendly at $0.4/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
First Sonnet 4 generation. Bridge between 3.5/3.7 and Sonnet 5.
Llama 3.1 70B instruct. Predecessor to 3.3 70B and Llama 4.
Δ 215 Arena Elo pts
125 tok/s
$0.4 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Llama 3.1 70B | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +215 | ||
| Coding Elo | — | — | |
| LiveBench | +16.4% | ||
| SWE-bench | +22.6% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +28.4% | ||
| Time to first token | +50 ms | ||
| Output speed | 92 tok/s | 125 tok/s | +33 tok/s |
| Input price | $0.35/1M | +$2.65/1M | |
| Output price | $0.4/1M | +$14.6/1M | |
| Context window | +72k |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Llama 3.1 70B is estimated to save $311.75/month ($3,741/year).
Higher SWE-bench (62.8%).
Lower output list price ($0.4/1M).
Lower TTFT (170 ms).
Larger window (200k).
Claude Sonnet 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Claude Sonnet 4 | Higher SWE-bench (62.8%). |
| High-volume chat | Llama 3.1 70B | Lower output list price ($0.4/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Llama 3.1 70B | Lower TTFT (170 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Claude Sonnet 4 | Larger window (200k). |
| Screenshots / vision | Claude Sonnet 4 | Claude Sonnet 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-sonnet-4-vs-llama-3-1-70b/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry
