Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Claude Opus 4.8 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,598 vs 1,560), while OpenAI o3-mini leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (78.5%), while OpenAI o3-mini is more budget-friendly at $4.4/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
10 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
Prior Opus generation still billed at $5/$25. Kept as a compare baseline against Opus 5.
OpenAI cost-efficient reasoning model with adjustable thinking effort and top coding benchmark scores.
Currently comparing Claude Opus 4.8 vs OpenAI o3-mini. Alternative family tiers available.
Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost
Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.
Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost
Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.
Δ 38 Arena Elo pts
92 tok/s
$4.4 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.8 | OpenAI o3-mini | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +38 | ||
| Coding Elo | +19 | ||
| LiveBench | +1.2% | ||
| SWE-bench | +0.1% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +1% | ||
| Time to first token | +40 ms | ||
| Output speed | 66 tok/s | 92 tok/s | +26 tok/s |
| Input price | $1.1/1M | +$3.9/1M | |
| Output price | $4.4/1M | +$20.6/1M | |
| Context window | +800k |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
OpenAI o3-mini is estimated to save $445.50/month ($5,346/year).
Higher SWE-bench (78.5%).
Lower output list price ($4.4/1M).
Lower TTFT (290 ms).
Larger window (1M).
Claude Opus 4.8 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | OpenAI o3-mini | Higher SWE-bench (78.5%). |
| High-volume chat | OpenAI o3-mini | Lower output list price ($4.4/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | OpenAI o3-mini | Lower TTFT (290 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Claude Opus 4.8 | Larger window (1M). |
| Screenshots / vision | Claude Opus 4.8 | Claude Opus 4.8 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-opus-4-8-vs-o3-mini/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry
