CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Opus 4.5 vs Yi-Lightning

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Yi-Lightning benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Claude Opus 4.5 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,568 vs 1,475), while Claude Opus 4.5 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (76.8%), while Yi-Lightning is more budget-friendly at $0.14/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Yi-Lightning if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

10 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Claude Opus 4.5 (6)Yi-Lightning (4)
Claude Opus 4.5
6 of 10 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓Coding Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond✓Context window
Yi-Lightning
4 of 10 Wins
✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price
Anthropic
Leads 6 of 10 metrics
Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic frontier coding and computer-use model. SWE-bench leader on the official mini-SWE-agent harness in the Feb 2026 refresh.

Elo 1,568$25/1M out
01.AI
Leads 4 of 10 metrics
Yi-Lightning

01.AI ultra-fast reasoning model delivering top LiveBench efficiency.

LightningElo 1,475$0.14/1M out

Claude 4 Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

5 models

Currently comparing Claude Opus 4.5 vs Yi-Lightning. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: Claude Opus 4.5
Claude Opus 4.6$25Claude Sonnet 4.5$15Claude Opus 4.8$25Claude Haiku 4.5$5

Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model A

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (16k budget)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Thinking Delay
380 ms
Standard speed
Reasoning Depth
~3,200
Internal tokens
Cost / 1k Calls
$90.00
9.0× standard bill
Accuracy Boost
+5.2% accuracy
STEM & SWE-bench
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude Opus 4.5
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderClaude Opus 4.5 Wins

Claude Opus 4.5

Δ 93 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderYi-Lightning Wins

Yi-Lightning

130 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderYi-Lightning Wins

Yi-Lightning

$0.14 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude Opus 4.5 (6)vsYi-Lightning (4)
Claude Opus 4.5: 6W (60%)Overall: Claude Opus 4.5Yi-Lightning: 4W (40%)
← Claude Opus 4.5Yi-Lightning →
🏆Claude Opus 4.5(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Claude Opus 4.5vsYi-Lightning
Preference Elo
1,568vs1,475+93
Coding Elo
1,574vs1,480+94
SWE-bench
76.8%vs63.4%+13.4%
LiveBench
71.2%vs65%+6.2%
GPQA Diamond
84.1%vs78%+6.1%
Claude Opus 4.5: 5WYi-Lightning: 0W
🏆Yi-Lightning(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Claude Opus 4.5vsYi-Lightning
Output speed
62 tok/svs130 tok/s+68 tok/s
Time to first token
380 msvs150 ms+230 ms
Claude Opus 4.5: 0WYi-Lightning: 2W
🏆Yi-Lightning(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Claude Opus 4.5vsYi-Lightning
Output price
$25/1Mvs$0.14/1M+$24.86/1M
Input price
$5/1Mvs$0.14/1M+$4.86/1M
Context window
200kvs16k+184k
Claude Opus 4.5: 1WYi-Lightning: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+93
Claude Opus 4.51,568
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Yi-Lightning1,475
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Coding Elo+94
Claude Opus 4.51,574
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Yi-Lightning1,480
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
LiveBench+6.2%
Claude Opus 4.571.2%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
Yi-Lightning65%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
SWE-bench+13.4%
Claude Opus 4.576.8%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
Yi-Lightning63.4%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
GPQA Diamond+6.1%
Claude Opus 4.584.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Yi-Lightning78%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+230 ms
Claude Opus 4.5380 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Yi-Lightning150 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+68 tok/s
Claude Opus 4.562 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Yi-Lightning130 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$4.86/1M
Claude Opus 4.5$5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Yi-Lightning$0.14/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$24.86/1M
Claude Opus 4.5$25/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Yi-Lightning$0.14/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+184k
Claude Opus 4.5200k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Yi-Lightning16k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Yi-LightningAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,568
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
1,475
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
+93
Coding Elo
1,574
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
1,480
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
+94
LiveBench
71.2%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
65%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
+6.2%
SWE-bench
76.8%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
63.4%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
+13.4%
GPQA Diamond
84.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
78%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+6.1%
Time to first token
380 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
150 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+230 ms
Output speed
62 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
130 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+68 tok/s
Input price
$5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.14/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$4.86/1M
Output price
$25/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.14/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$24.86/1M
Context window
200k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
16k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+184k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 99% with Yi-Lightning
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Opus 4.5$550.00 / mo
In: $175Out: $375
Yi-Lightning$7.00 / mo
In: $4.9Out: $2.1
Estimated Cost Delta

Yi-Lightning is estimated to save $543.00/month ($6,516/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Opus 4.5:Pick Claude Opus 4.5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Yi-Lightning:Pick Yi-Lightning when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Yi-Lightning:Pick Yi-Lightning when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Opus 4.5

Higher SWE-bench (76.8%).

High-volume chatYi-Lightning

Lower output list price ($0.14/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIYi-Lightning

Lower TTFT (150 ms).

Long-document RAGClaude Opus 4.5

Larger window (200k).

Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Opus 4.5Higher SWE-bench (76.8%).
High-volume chatYi-LightningLower output list price ($0.14/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIYi-LightningLower TTFT (150 ms).
Long-document RAGClaude Opus 4.5Larger window (200k).
Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchFeb 20, 2026

Claude Opus 4.5 and the Feb 2026 SWE-bench row we still cite

The Feb refresh made 4.5 a coding reference. Newer Opus SKUs exist; this row stays as the dated harness point.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-opus-4-5-vs-yi-lightning/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5

Elo 1,568
SWE-bench76.8%
Speed (tok/s)62 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$5/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$25/1M
01.AI

Yi-Lightning

Elo 1,475
SWE-bench63.4%
Speed (tok/s)130 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.14/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.14/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Opus 4.5 or Yi-Lightning?
Claude Opus 4.5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,568). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or Yi-Lightning?
Claude Opus 4.5 leads SWE-bench at 76.8% vs 63.4%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Yi-Lightning output tokens are $0.14/1M versus $25/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.5 or Yi-Lightning?
Yi-Lightning has the lower time-to-first-token (150 ms vs 380 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Opus 4.5 accepts 200k tokens versus 16k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Opus 4.5 and Yi-Lightning Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Feb 20, 2026

    Claude Opus 4.5 and the Feb 2026 SWE-bench row we still cite

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Opus 4.5 matchups →|All Yi-Lightning matchups →
Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4 (previous opus)Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 (next opus)Yi-Lightning vs Yi-Large (previous other)Yi-Lightning vs Ernie 4.5 Turbo (next other)Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.5