CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Fable 5 vs MiniMax M2.5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Fable 5 vs MiniMax M2.5 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Claude Fable 5 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,616 vs 1,478), while Claude Fable 5 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (80%), while MiniMax M2.5 is more budget-friendly at $1.2/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Claude Fable 5 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose MiniMax M2.5 if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

10 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Claude Fable 5 (6)MiniMax M2.5 (4)
Claude Fable 5
6 of 10 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓Coding Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond✓Context window
MiniMax M2.5
4 of 10 Wins
✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price
Anthropic
Leads 6 of 10 metrics
Claude Fable 5

Anthropic top-tier X-High reasoning model engineered for heavy multi-step tasks. Official API $10/$50 per 1M tokens (Claude Platform pricing, Aug 2026).

Fable 5 (X-High Reasoning)Elo 1,616$50/1M out
MiniMax
Leads 4 of 10 metrics
MiniMax M2.5

MiniMax coding model. Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026.

Elo 1,478$1.2/1M out

Claude 5 Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

3 models

Currently comparing Claude Fable 5 vs MiniMax M2.5. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: Claude Fable 5
Claude Opus 5$25Claude Sonnet 5$10

Claude Fable 5 Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model A

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (16k budget)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Thinking Delay
340 ms
Standard speed
Reasoning Depth
~3,200
Internal tokens
Cost / 1k Calls
$180.00
9.0× standard bill
Accuracy Boost
+5.2% accuracy
STEM & SWE-bench
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude Fable 5
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderClaude Fable 5 Wins

Claude Fable 5

Δ 138 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderMiniMax M2.5 Wins

MiniMax M2.5

90 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderMiniMax M2.5 Wins

MiniMax M2.5

$1.2 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude Fable 5 (6)vsMiniMax M2.5 (4)
Claude Fable 5: 6W (60%)Overall: Claude Fable 5MiniMax M2.5: 4W (40%)
← Claude Fable 5MiniMax M2.5 →
🏆Claude Fable 5(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Claude Fable 5vsMiniMax M2.5
Preference Elo
1,616vs1,478+138
Coding Elo
1,622vs1,536+86
SWE-bench
80%vs75.8%+4.2%
LiveBench
75.2%vs64.4%+10.8%
GPQA Diamond
87.6%vs76.2%+11.4%
Claude Fable 5: 5WMiniMax M2.5: 0W
🏆MiniMax M2.5(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Claude Fable 5vsMiniMax M2.5
Output speed
58 tok/svs90 tok/s+32 tok/s
Time to first token
340 msvs250 ms+90 ms
Claude Fable 5: 0WMiniMax M2.5: 2W
🏆MiniMax M2.5(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Claude Fable 5vsMiniMax M2.5
Output price
$50/1Mvs$1.2/1M+$48.8/1M
Input price
$10/1Mvs$0.3/1M+$9.7/1M
Context window
1Mvs205k+795k
Claude Fable 5: 1WMiniMax M2.5: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+138
Claude Fable 51,616
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.51,478
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Coding Elo+86
Claude Fable 51,622
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.51,536
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
LiveBench+10.8%
Claude Fable 575.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.564.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
SWE-bench+4.2%
Claude Fable 580%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.575.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPQA Diamond+11.4%
Claude Fable 587.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.576.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+90 ms
Claude Fable 5340 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.5250 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+32 tok/s
Claude Fable 558 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.590 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$9.7/1M
Claude Fable 5$10/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.5$0.3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$48.8/1M
Claude Fable 5$50/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.5$1.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+795k
Claude Fable 51M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
MiniMax M2.5205k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5MiniMax M2.5Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,616
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
1,478
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+138
Coding Elo
1,622
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
1,536
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+86
LiveBench
75.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
64.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+10.8%
SWE-bench
80%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
75.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+4.2%
GPQA Diamond
87.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
76.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+11.4%
Time to first token
340 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
250 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+90 ms
Output speed
58 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
90 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+32 tok/s
Input price
$10/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
$0.3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$9.7/1M
Output price
$50/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
$1.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$48.8/1M
Context window
1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
205k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+795k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 97% with MiniMax M2.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Fable 5$1,100.00 / mo
In: $350Out: $750
MiniMax M2.5$28.50 / mo
In: $10.5Out: $18
Estimated Cost Delta

MiniMax M2.5 is estimated to save $1,071.50/month ($12,858/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Fable 5:Pick Claude Fable 5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    MiniMax M2.5:Pick MiniMax M2.5 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    MiniMax M2.5:Pick MiniMax M2.5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Fable 5

Higher SWE-bench (80%).

High-volume chatMiniMax M2.5

Lower output list price ($1.2/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIMiniMax M2.5

Lower TTFT (250 ms).

Long-document RAGClaude Fable 5

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Fable 5Higher SWE-bench (80%).
High-volume chatMiniMax M2.5Lower output list price ($1.2/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIMiniMax M2.5Lower TTFT (250 ms).
Long-document RAGClaude Fable 5Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Fable 5Claude Fable 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchJun 15, 2026

Claude Fable 5: the $10/$50 X-High Reasoning Anthropic SKU

Fable 5 is Anthropic's top-tier X-High reasoning tier. Read SWE-bench and output price together.

launchFeb 12, 2026

MiniMax M2.5: the Feb 2026 SWE-bench specialist still on the board

Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026. Coding lists should still see it.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-fable-5-vs-minimax-m2-5/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Claude Fable 5

Elo 1,616
SWE-bench80%
Speed (tok/s)58 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$10/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$50/1M
MiniMax

MiniMax M2.5

Elo 1,478
SWE-bench75.8%
Speed (tok/s)90 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1.2/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax M2.5?
Claude Fable 5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,616). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax M2.5?
Claude Fable 5 leads SWE-bench at 80% vs 75.8%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
MiniMax M2.5 output tokens are $1.2/1M versus $50/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax M2.5?
MiniMax M2.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (250 ms vs 340 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Fable 5 accepts 1M tokens versus 205k.
Can I self-host either model?
MiniMax M2.5 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Fable 5 and MiniMax M2.5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Jun 15, 2026

    Claude Fable 5: the $10/$50 X-High Reasoning Anthropic SKU

  • launch · Feb 12, 2026

    MiniMax M2.5: the Feb 2026 SWE-bench specialist still on the board

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Fable 5 matchups →|All MiniMax M2.5 matchups →
Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiniMax M2.5