CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 1.5 Pro

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 1.5 Pro benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Claude Fable 5 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,616 vs 1,260), while Claude Fable 5 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (80%), while Gemini 1.5 Pro is more budget-friendly at $5/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Claude Fable 5 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Gemini 1.5 Pro if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Claude Fable 5 (4)Gemini 1.5 Pro (5)
Claude Fable 5
4 of 9 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond
Gemini 1.5 Pro
5 of 9 Wins
✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
Anthropic
Leads 4 of 9 metrics
Claude Fable 5

Anthropic top-tier X-High reasoning model engineered for heavy multi-step tasks. Official API $10/$50 per 1M tokens (Claude Platform pricing, Aug 2026).

Fable 5 (X-High Reasoning)Elo 1,616$50/1M out
Google
Leads 5 of 9 metrics
Gemini 1.5 Pro

First million-token Gemini Pro. Baseline for 1.5 vs 2.5 vs 3.x Pro.

Elo 1,260$5/1M out

Claude 5 Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

3 models

Currently comparing Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 1.5 Pro. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: Claude Fable 5
Claude Opus 5$25Claude Sonnet 5$10

Claude Fable 5 Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model A

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (16k budget)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Thinking Delay
340 ms
Standard speed
Reasoning Depth
~3,200
Internal tokens
Cost / 1k Calls
$180.00
9.0× standard bill
Accuracy Boost
+5.2% accuracy
STEM & SWE-bench
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude Fable 5
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderClaude Fable 5 Wins

Claude Fable 5

Δ 356 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderGemini 1.5 Pro Wins

Gemini 1.5 Pro

70 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderGemini 1.5 Pro Wins

Gemini 1.5 Pro

$5 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude Fable 5 (5)vsGemini 1.5 Pro (5)
Claude Fable 5: 5W (50%)Overall: Even matchupGemini 1.5 Pro: 5W (50%)
← Claude Fable 5Gemini 1.5 Pro →
🏆Claude Fable 5(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Claude Fable 5vsGemini 1.5 Pro
Preference Elo
1,616vs1,260+356
Coding Elo
1,622vs—
SWE-bench
80%vs38%+42%
LiveBench
75.2%vs49.2%+26%
GPQA Diamond
87.6%vs58%+29.6%
Claude Fable 5: 5WGemini 1.5 Pro: 0W
🏆Gemini 1.5 Pro(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Claude Fable 5vsGemini 1.5 Pro
Output speed
58 tok/svs70 tok/s+12 tok/s
Time to first token
340 msvs240 ms+100 ms
Claude Fable 5: 0WGemini 1.5 Pro: 2W
🏆Gemini 1.5 Pro(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Claude Fable 5vsGemini 1.5 Pro
Output price
$50/1Mvs$5/1M+$45/1M
Input price
$10/1Mvs$1.25/1M+$8.75/1M
Context window
1Mvs2M+1M
Claude Fable 5: 0WGemini 1.5 Pro: 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+356
Claude Fable 51,616
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro1,260
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Coding Elo
Claude Fable 51,622
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro—
LiveBench+26%
Claude Fable 575.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro49.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
SWE-bench+42%
Claude Fable 580%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro38%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPQA Diamond+29.6%
Claude Fable 587.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro58%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+100 ms
Claude Fable 5340 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro240 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+12 tok/s
Claude Fable 558 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro70 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$8.75/1M
Claude Fable 5$10/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro$1.25/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$45/1M
Claude Fable 5$50/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro$5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+1M
Claude Fable 51M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro2M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Gemini 1.5 ProAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,616
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
1,260
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+356
Coding Elo
1,622
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
——
LiveBench
75.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
49.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+26%
SWE-bench
80%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
38%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+42%
GPQA Diamond
87.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
58%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+29.6%
Time to first token
340 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
240 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+100 ms
Output speed
58 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
70 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+12 tok/s
Input price
$10/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
$1.25/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$8.75/1M
Output price
$50/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
$5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$45/1M
Context window
1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
2M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+1M
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 89% with Gemini 1.5 Pro
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Fable 5$1,100.00 / mo
In: $350Out: $750
Gemini 1.5 Pro$118.75 / mo
In: $43.75Out: $75
Estimated Cost Delta

Gemini 1.5 Pro is estimated to save $981.25/month ($11,775/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Fable 5:Pick Claude Fable 5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Gemini 1.5 Pro:Pick Gemini 1.5 Pro when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Gemini 1.5 Pro:Pick Gemini 1.5 Pro when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Fable 5

Higher SWE-bench (80%).

High-volume chatGemini 1.5 Pro

Lower output list price ($5/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGemini 1.5 Pro

Lower TTFT (240 ms).

Long-document RAGGemini 1.5 Pro

Larger window (2M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Fable 5

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Fable 5).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Fable 5Higher SWE-bench (80%).
High-volume chatGemini 1.5 ProLower output list price ($5/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGemini 1.5 ProLower TTFT (240 ms).
Long-document RAGGemini 1.5 ProLarger window (2M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Fable 5Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Fable 5).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchJun 15, 2026

Claude Fable 5: the $10/$50 X-High Reasoning Anthropic SKU

Fable 5 is Anthropic's top-tier X-High reasoning tier. Read SWE-bench and output price together.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-fable-5-vs-gemini-1-5-pro/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Claude Fable 5

Elo 1,616
SWE-bench80%
Speed (tok/s)58 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$10/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$50/1M
Google

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Elo 1,260
SWE-bench38%
Speed (tok/s)70 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$1.25/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$5/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 1.5 Pro?
Claude Fable 5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,616). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 1.5 Pro?
Claude Fable 5 leads SWE-bench at 80% vs 38%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Gemini 1.5 Pro output tokens are $5/1M versus $50/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 1.5 Pro?
Gemini 1.5 Pro has the lower time-to-first-token (240 ms vs 340 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 1.5 Pro accepts 2M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 1.5 Pro Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Jun 15, 2026

    Claude Fable 5: the $10/$50 X-High Reasoning Anthropic SKU

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Fable 5 matchups →|All Gemini 1.5 Pro matchups →
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Pro (next gemini-pro)Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5Gemini 3.6 Pro vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Fable 5