CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Fable 5 vs Doubao Pro 1.5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026

Claude Fable 5 vs Doubao Pro 1.5 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Claude Fable 5 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,616 vs 1,470), while Claude Fable 5 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (80%), while Doubao Pro 1.5 is more budget-friendly at $0.28/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Claude Fable 5 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Doubao Pro 1.5 if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

10 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Claude Fable 5 (6)Doubao Pro 1.5 (4)
Claude Fable 5
6 of 10 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓Coding Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond✓Context window
Doubao Pro 1.5
4 of 10 Wins
✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price
Anthropic
Leads 6 of 10 metrics
Claude Fable 5

Anthropic top-tier X-High reasoning model engineered for heavy multi-step tasks. Official API $10/$50 per 1M tokens (Claude Platform pricing, Aug 2026).

Fable 5 (X-High Reasoning)Elo 1,616$50/1M out
ByteDance
Leads 4 of 10 metrics
Doubao Pro 1.5

ByteDance flagship enterprise model with ultra-low token cost and 128k context.

Elo 1,470$0.28/1M out

Claude 5 Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

3 models

Currently comparing Claude Fable 5 vs Doubao Pro 1.5. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: Claude Fable 5
Claude Opus 5$50Claude Sonnet 5$10

Claude Fable 5 Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model A

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (16k budget)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Thinking Delay
340 ms
Standard speed
Reasoning Depth
~3,200
Internal tokens
Cost / 1k Calls
$180.00
9.0× standard bill
Accuracy Boost
+5.2% accuracy
STEM & SWE-bench
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude Fable 5
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderClaude Fable 5 Wins

Claude Fable 5

Δ 146 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderDoubao Pro 1.5 Wins

Doubao Pro 1.5

105 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderDoubao Pro 1.5 Wins

Doubao Pro 1.5

$0.28 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude Fable 5 (6)vsDoubao Pro 1.5 (4)
Claude Fable 5: 6W (60%)Overall: Claude Fable 5Doubao Pro 1.5: 4W (40%)
← Claude Fable 5Doubao Pro 1.5 →
🏆Claude Fable 5(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Claude Fable 5vsDoubao Pro 1.5
Preference Elo
1,616vs1,470+146
Coding Elo
1,622vs1,465+157
SWE-bench
80%vs62.1%+17.9%
LiveBench
75.2%vs64%+11.2%
GPQA Diamond
87.6%vs77.5%+10.1%
Claude Fable 5: 5WDoubao Pro 1.5: 0W
🏆Doubao Pro 1.5(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Claude Fable 5vsDoubao Pro 1.5
Output speed
58 tok/svs105 tok/s+47 tok/s
Time to first token
340 msvs190 ms+150 ms
Claude Fable 5: 0WDoubao Pro 1.5: 2W
🏆Doubao Pro 1.5(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Claude Fable 5vsDoubao Pro 1.5
Output price
$50/1Mvs$0.28/1M+$49.72/1M
Input price
$10/1Mvs$0.11/1M+$9.89/1M
Context window
1Mvs128k+872k
Claude Fable 5: 1WDoubao Pro 1.5: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+146
Claude Fable 51,616
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
Doubao Pro 1.51,470
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Coding Elo+157
Claude Fable 51,622
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
Doubao Pro 1.51,465
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
LiveBench+11.2%
Claude Fable 575.2%
livebench · Aug 16, 2026
Doubao Pro 1.564%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
SWE-bench+17.9%
Claude Fable 580%
swebench · Aug 16, 2026
Doubao Pro 1.562.1%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
GPQA Diamond+10.1%
Claude Fable 587.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Doubao Pro 1.577.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+150 ms
Claude Fable 5340 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Doubao Pro 1.5190 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+47 tok/s
Claude Fable 558 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Doubao Pro 1.5105 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$9.89/1M
Claude Fable 5$10/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Doubao Pro 1.5$0.11/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$49.72/1M
Claude Fable 5$50/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Doubao Pro 1.5$0.28/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+872k
Claude Fable 51M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Doubao Pro 1.5128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Doubao Pro 1.5Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,616
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
1,470
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
+146
Coding Elo
1,622
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
1,465
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
+157
LiveBench
75.2%
livebench · Aug 16, 2026
64%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
+11.2%
SWE-bench
80%
swebench · Aug 16, 2026
62.1%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
+17.9%
GPQA Diamond
87.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
77.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+10.1%
Time to first token
340 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
190 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+150 ms
Output speed
58 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
105 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+47 tok/s
Input price
$10/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.11/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$9.89/1M
Output price
$50/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.28/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$49.72/1M
Context window
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+872k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 99% with Doubao Pro 1.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Fable 5$1,100.00 / mo
In: $350Out: $750
Doubao Pro 1.5$8.05 / mo
In: $3.85Out: $4.2
Estimated Cost Delta

Doubao Pro 1.5 is estimated to save $1,091.95/month ($13,103/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Fable 5:Pick Claude Fable 5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Doubao Pro 1.5:Pick Doubao Pro 1.5 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Doubao Pro 1.5:Pick Doubao Pro 1.5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Fable 5

Higher SWE-bench (80%).

High-volume chatDoubao Pro 1.5

Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIDoubao Pro 1.5

Lower TTFT (190 ms).

Long-document RAGClaude Fable 5

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Fable 5

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Fable 5).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Fable 5Higher SWE-bench (80%).
High-volume chatDoubao Pro 1.5Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIDoubao Pro 1.5Lower TTFT (190 ms).
Long-document RAGClaude Fable 5Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Fable 5Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Fable 5).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchJun 15, 2026

Claude Fable 5: the $10/$50 X-High Reasoning Anthropic SKU

Fable 5 is Anthropic's top-tier X-High reasoning tier. Read SWE-bench and output price together.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-fable-5-vs-doubao-1-5-pro-128k/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Claude Fable 5

Elo 1,616
SWE-bench80%
Speed (tok/s)58 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$10/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$50/1M
ByteDance

Doubao Pro 1.5

Elo 1,470
SWE-bench62.1%
Speed (tok/s)105 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.11/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.28/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Fable 5 or Doubao Pro 1.5?
Claude Fable 5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,616). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Fable 5 or Doubao Pro 1.5?
Claude Fable 5 leads SWE-bench at 80% vs 62.1%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Doubao Pro 1.5 output tokens are $0.28/1M versus $50/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Fable 5 or Doubao Pro 1.5?
Doubao Pro 1.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (190 ms vs 340 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Fable 5 accepts 1M tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Fable 5 and Doubao Pro 1.5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Jun 15, 2026

    Claude Fable 5: the $10/$50 X-High Reasoning Anthropic SKU

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Fable 5 matchups →|All Doubao Pro 1.5 matchups →
Doubao Pro 1.5 vs Doubao Lite 1.5 (previous seed)Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Fable 5