CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs DeepSeek: R1 0528

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs DeepSeek: R1 0528 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, DeepSeek: R1 0528 is more budget-friendly at $2.15/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Claude 3.7 Sonnet if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose DeepSeek: R1 0528 if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

3 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (1)DeepSeek: R1 0528 (2)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
1 of 3 Wins
✓Context window
DeepSeek: R1 0528
2 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price
Anthropic
Leads 1 of 3 metrics
Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Hybrid-reasoning Sonnet from 2025. Kept for historical compare pages.

Elo 1,362$15/1M out
DeepSeek
Leads 2 of 3 metrics
DeepSeek: R1 0528

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (deepseek/deepseek-r1-0528). Preview until a second source matches.

$2.1500000000000004/1M out

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model A

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (16k budget)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Thinking Delay
240 ms
Standard speed
Reasoning Depth
~3,200
Internal tokens
Cost / 1k Calls
$54.00
9.0× standard bill
Accuracy Boost
+5.2% accuracy
STEM & SWE-bench
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude 3.7 Sonnet
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderDeepSeek: R1 0528 Wins

DeepSeek: R1 0528

$2.1500000000000004 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (7)vsDeepSeek: R1 0528 (2)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 7W (78%)Overall: Claude 3.7 SonnetDeepSeek: R1 0528: 2W (22%)
← Claude 3.7 SonnetDeepSeek: R1 0528 →
🏆Claude 3.7 Sonnet(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Claude 3.7 SonnetvsDeepSeek: R1 0528
Preference Elo
1,362vs—
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
70.3%vs—
LiveBench
58.4%vs—
GPQA Diamond
78.5%vs—
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 4WDeepSeek: R1 0528: 0W
🏆Claude 3.7 Sonnet(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Claude 3.7 SonnetvsDeepSeek: R1 0528
Output speed
85 tok/svs—
Time to first token
240 msvs—
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 2WDeepSeek: R1 0528: 0W
🏆DeepSeek: R1 0528(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Claude 3.7 SonnetvsDeepSeek: R1 0528
Output price
$15/1Mvs$2.15/1M+$12.85/1M
Input price
$3/1Mvs$0.5/1M+$2.5/1M
Context window
200kvs164k+36k
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 1WDeepSeek: R1 0528: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo
Claude 3.7 Sonnet1,362
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
DeepSeek: R1 0528—
LiveBench
Claude 3.7 Sonnet58.4%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
DeepSeek: R1 0528—
SWE-bench
Claude 3.7 Sonnet70.3%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
DeepSeek: R1 0528—
GPQA Diamond
Claude 3.7 Sonnet78.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek: R1 0528—
Time to first token
Claude 3.7 Sonnet240 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek: R1 0528—
Output speed
Claude 3.7 Sonnet85 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek: R1 0528—
Input price+$2.5/1M
Claude 3.7 Sonnet$3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek: R1 0528$0.5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Output price+$12.85/1M
Claude 3.7 Sonnet$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek: R1 0528$2.15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Context window+36k
Claude 3.7 Sonnet200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek: R1 0528164k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
BenchmarkClaude 3.7 SonnetDeepSeek: R1 0528Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,362
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
LiveBench
58.4%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
SWE-bench
70.3%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
78.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Time to first token
240 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Output speed
85 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Input price
$3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$2.5/1M
Output price
$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$2.15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$12.85/1M
Context window
200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
164k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+36k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 85% with DeepSeek: R1 0528
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet$330.00 / mo
In: $105Out: $225
DeepSeek: R1 0528$49.75 / mo
In: $17.5Out: $32.25
Estimated Cost Delta

DeepSeek: R1 0528 is estimated to save $280.25/month ($3,363/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    DeepSeek: R1 0528:Pick DeepSeek: R1 0528 when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatDeepSeek: R1 0528

Lower output list price ($2.15/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGClaude 3.7 Sonnet

Larger window (200k).

Screenshots / visionClaude 3.7 Sonnet

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatDeepSeek: R1 0528Lower output list price ($2.15/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGClaude 3.7 SonnetLarger window (200k).
Screenshots / visionClaude 3.7 SonnetClaude 3.7 Sonnet is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
newsFeb 25, 2025

Claude 3.7 Sonnet stays as a historical hybrid-reasoning baseline

2025 hybrid-reasoning Sonnet. Deprecated for buying, kept for old compare URLs and “what did 3.7 score?”

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-3-7-sonnet-vs-deepseek-r1-0528/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Elo 1,362
SWE-bench70.3%
Speed (tok/s)85 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$15/1M
DeepSeek

DeepSeek: R1 0528

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)164k
Input / 1M Tokens$0.5/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$2.15/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or DeepSeek: R1 0528?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or DeepSeek: R1 0528?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
DeepSeek: R1 0528 output tokens are $2.15/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or DeepSeek: R1 0528?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet accepts 200k tokens versus 164k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude 3.7 Sonnet and DeepSeek: R1 0528 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • news · Feb 25, 2025

    Claude 3.7 Sonnet stays as a historical hybrid-reasoning baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude 3.7 Sonnet matchups →|All DeepSeek: R1 0528 matchups →
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet (previous sonnet)Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude Sonnet 4 (next sonnet)Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude 3.7 SonnetClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude 3.7 SonnetClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude 3.7 SonnetClaude Opus 5 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet