CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs DeepSeek V3

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs DeepSeek V3 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, DeepSeek V3 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,310 vs 1,280), while Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (49%), while DeepSeek V3 is more budget-friendly at $1.03/1M per 1M output tokens, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet provides faster response streaming (80 tok/s). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: DeepSeek V3 holds the advantage over Claude 3.5 Sonnet in overall benchmark performance and human evaluation rankings. Choose DeepSeek V3 for demanding workloads, or review the breakdown below to compare coding and pricing metrics.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet

2024 workhorse. Still a high-intent compare against GPT-4o.

Elo 1,280$15/1M out
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V3

Prior DeepSeek flagship. Baseline for v3 vs v4.

Elo 1,310$1.0287/1M out
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude 3.5 Sonnet
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

DeepSeek V3

Δ 30 Arena Elo pts

Throughput Leader

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

80 tok/s

Value per Dollar Leader

DeepSeek V3

$1.0287 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageClaude 3.5 Sonnet 3/6
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (5)vsDeepSeek V3 (4)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 5W (56%)Overall: Claude 3.5 SonnetDeepSeek V3: 4W (44%)
← Claude 3.5 SonnetDeepSeek V3 →
Tied (2/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,280vs1,310
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
49%vs48.6%
LiveBench
52.1%vs55.4%
GPQA Diamond
65%vs59.1%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 2WDeepSeek V3: 2W
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
80 tok/svs66 tok/s
Time to first token
280 msvs380 ms
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 2WDeepSeek V3: 0W
DeepSeek V3 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$15/1Mvs$1.03/1M
Input price
$3/1Mvs$0.2574/1M
Context window
200kvs164k
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 1WDeepSeek V3: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference EloDeepSeek V3 (+30)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet1,280
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
DeepSeek V31,310
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
LiveBenchDeepSeek V3 (+3.3%)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet52.1%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
DeepSeek V355.4%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
SWE-benchClaude 3.5 Sonnet (+0.4%)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet49%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
DeepSeek V348.6%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
GPQA DiamondClaude 3.5 Sonnet (+5.9%)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet65%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek V359.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first tokenClaude 3.5 Sonnet (+100 ms)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet280 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek V3380 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speedClaude 3.5 Sonnet (+14 tok/s)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet80 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek V366 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input priceDeepSeek V3 (+$2.74/1M)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet$3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek V3$0.2574/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Output priceDeepSeek V3 (+$13.97/1M)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek V3$1.03/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Context windowClaude 3.5 Sonnet (+36k)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek V3164k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetDeepSeek V3Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,280
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
1,310
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
DeepSeek V3 (+30)
LiveBench
52.1%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
55.4%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
DeepSeek V3 (+3.3%)
SWE-bench
49%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
48.6%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (+0.4%)
GPQA Diamond
65%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
59.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (+5.9%)
Time to first token
280 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
380 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (+100 ms)
Output speed
80 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
66 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (+14 tok/s)
Input price
$3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.2574/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
DeepSeek V3 (+$2.74/1M)
Output price
$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$1.03/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
DeepSeek V3 (+$13.97/1M)
Context window
200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
164k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (+36k)
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 93% with DeepSeek V3
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet$330.00 / mo
In: $105Out: $225
DeepSeek V3$24.44 / mo
In: $9.01Out: $15.43
Estimated Cost Delta

DeepSeek V3 is estimated to save $305.56/month ($3,667/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude 3.5 Sonnet:Pick Claude 3.5 Sonnet when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    DeepSeek V3:Pick DeepSeek V3 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Claude 3.5 Sonnet:Pick Claude 3.5 Sonnet when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude 3.5 Sonnet

Higher SWE-bench (49%).

High-volume chatDeepSeek V3

Lower output list price ($1.03/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIClaude 3.5 Sonnet

Lower TTFT (280 ms).

Long-document RAGClaude 3.5 Sonnet

Larger window (200k).

Screenshots / visionClaude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude 3.5 SonnetHigher SWE-bench (49%).
High-volume chatDeepSeek V3Lower output list price ($1.03/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIClaude 3.5 SonnetLower TTFT (280 ms).
Long-document RAGClaude 3.5 SonnetLarger window (200k).
Screenshots / visionClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude 3.5 Sonnet is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-3-5-sonnet-vs-deepseek-v3/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Elo 1,280
LiveBench52.1%
SWE-bench49%
Speed80 tok/s
Output cost$15/1M
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3

Elo 1,310
LiveBench55.4%
SWE-bench48.6%
Speed66 tok/s
Output cost$1.03/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or DeepSeek V3?
DeepSeek V3 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,310). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or DeepSeek V3?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads SWE-bench at 49% vs 48.6%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
DeepSeek V3 output tokens are $1.03/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or DeepSeek V3?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the lower time-to-first-token (280 ms vs 380 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet accepts 200k tokens versus 164k.
Can I self-host either model?
DeepSeek V3 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude 3.5 Sonnet and DeepSeek V3 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude 3.5 Sonnet matchups →|All DeepSeek V3 matchups →
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet (next sonnet)DeepSeek V3 vs DeepSeek Coder V2 (previous deepseek)DeepSeek V3 vs DeepSeek R1 (next deepseek)Claude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V3Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3