CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Command A

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Command A benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Command A delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,344 vs 1,280), while Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (49%), while Command A is more budget-friendly at $10/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Command A holds the advantage over Claude 3.5 Sonnet in overall benchmark performance and human evaluation rankings. Choose Command A for demanding workloads, or review the breakdown below to compare coding and pricing metrics.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (1)Command A (8)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
1 of 9 Wins
✓SWE-bench
Command A
8 of 9 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓LiveBench✓GPQA Diamond✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
Anthropic
Leads 1 of 9 metrics
Claude 3.5 Sonnet

2024 workhorse. Still a high-intent compare against GPT-4o.

Elo 1,280$15/1M out
Cohere
Leads 8 of 9 metrics
Command A

Cohere enterprise RAG and tool-use model.

Elo 1,344$10/1M out
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude 3.5 Sonnet
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderCommand A Wins

Command A

Δ 64 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderCommand A Wins

Command A

118 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderCommand A Wins

Command A

$10 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (1)vsCommand A (8)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 1W (11%)Overall: Command ACommand A: 8W (89%)
← Claude 3.5 SonnetCommand A →
🏆Command A(3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Claude 3.5 SonnetvsCommand A
Preference Elo
1,280vs1,344+64
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
49%vs42.6%+6.4%
LiveBench
52.1%vs56.2%+4.1%
GPQA Diamond
65%vs66%+1%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 1WCommand A: 3W
🏆Command A(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Claude 3.5 SonnetvsCommand A
Output speed
80 tok/svs118 tok/s+38 tok/s
Time to first token
280 msvs175 ms+105 ms
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 0WCommand A: 2W
🏆Command A(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Claude 3.5 SonnetvsCommand A
Output price
$15/1Mvs$10/1M+$5/1M
Input price
$3/1Mvs$2.5/1M+$0.5/1M
Context window
200kvs256k+56k
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 0WCommand A: 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+64
Claude 3.5 Sonnet1,280
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Command A1,344
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
LiveBench+4.1%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet52.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Command A56.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
SWE-bench+6.4%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet49%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Command A42.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPQA Diamond+1%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet65%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Command A66%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+105 ms
Claude 3.5 Sonnet280 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Command A175 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+38 tok/s
Claude 3.5 Sonnet80 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Command A118 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$0.5/1M
Claude 3.5 Sonnet$3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Command A$2.5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$5/1M
Claude 3.5 Sonnet$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Command A$10/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+56k
Claude 3.5 Sonnet200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Command A256k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetCommand AAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,280
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,344
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+64
LiveBench
52.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
56.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+4.1%
SWE-bench
49%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
42.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+6.4%
GPQA Diamond
65%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
66%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+1%
Time to first token
280 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
175 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+105 ms
Output speed
80 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
118 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+38 tok/s
Input price
$3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$2.5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.5/1M
Output price
$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$10/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$5/1M
Context window
200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
256k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+56k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 28% with Command A
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet$330.00 / mo
In: $105Out: $225
Command A$237.50 / mo
In: $87.5Out: $150
Estimated Cost Delta

Command A is estimated to save $92.50/month ($1,110/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude 3.5 Sonnet:Pick Claude 3.5 Sonnet when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Command A:Pick Command A when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Command A:Pick Command A when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude 3.5 Sonnet

Higher SWE-bench (49%).

High-volume chatCommand A

Lower output list price ($10/1M).

Voice / low-latency UICommand A

Lower TTFT (175 ms).

Long-document RAGCommand A

Larger window (256k).

Screenshots / visionClaude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude 3.5 SonnetHigher SWE-bench (49%).
High-volume chatCommand ALower output list price ($10/1M).
Voice / low-latency UICommand ALower TTFT (175 ms).
Long-document RAGCommand ALarger window (256k).
Screenshots / visionClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude 3.5 Sonnet is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchMar 13, 2025

Command A: Cohere’s enterprise RAG and tool-use row

Mar 2025. RAG and tools, not a frontier Elo play. Listed so “command a benchmark” has a sourced page.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-3-5-sonnet-vs-command-a/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Elo 1,280
SWE-bench49%
Speed (tok/s)80 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$15/1M
Cohere

Command A

Elo 1,344
SWE-bench42.6%
Speed (tok/s)118 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$2.5/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$10/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Command A?
Command A has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,344). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Command A?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads SWE-bench at 49% vs 42.6%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Command A output tokens are $10/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Command A?
Command A has the lower time-to-first-token (175 ms vs 280 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Command A accepts 256k tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Command A Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Mar 13, 2025

    Command A: Cohere’s enterprise RAG and tool-use row

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude 3.5 Sonnet matchups →|All Command A matchups →
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet (next sonnet)Claude Opus 4.5 vs Command AClaude Opus 4.6 vs Command AClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs Command AClaude Opus 5 vs Command AClaude Fable 5 vs Command A