Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Seed 2.1 Turbo delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,472 vs 1,224), while Seed 2.1 Turbo leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (63.2%), while Seed 2.1 Turbo is more budget-friendly at $1.1/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
Previous cheap Claude. Haiku 4.5 is the current $1/$5 SKU.
ByteDance Seed 2.1 Turbo, listed on public model timelines as an Aug 10 2026 API drop.
Δ 248 Arena Elo pts
160 tok/s
$1.1 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Seed 2.1 Turbo | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +248 | ||
| Coding Elo | — | — | |
| LiveBench | +20% | ||
| SWE-bench | +27% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +22.7% | ||
| Time to first token | +10 ms | ||
| Output speed | 140 tok/s | 160 tok/s | +20 tok/s |
| Input price | $0.8/1M | $0.27/1M | +$0.53/1M |
| Output price | +$2.9/1M | ||
| Context window | +56k |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Seed 2.1 Turbo is estimated to save $62.05/month ($745/year).
Higher SWE-bench (63.2%).
Lower output list price ($1.1/1M).
Lower TTFT (110 ms).
Larger window (256k).
Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Seed 2.1 Turbo).
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Seed 2.1 Turbo | Higher SWE-bench (63.2%). |
| High-volume chat | Seed 2.1 Turbo | Lower output list price ($1.1/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Lower TTFT (110 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Seed 2.1 Turbo | Larger window (256k). |
| Screenshots / vision | Seed 2.1 Turbo | Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Seed 2.1 Turbo). |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-3-5-haiku-vs-seed-2-1-turbo/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry
