CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) is more budget-friendly at $0/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

3 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Claude 3.5 Haiku (0)Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) (3)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
0 of 3 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)
3 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku

Previous cheap Claude. Haiku 4.5 is the current $1/$5 SKU.

Elo 1,224$4/1M out
Google
Leads 3 of 3 metrics
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it:free). Preview until a second source matches.

$0/1M out
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude 3.5 Haiku
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) Wins

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)

$0 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude 3.5 Haiku (6)vsGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) (3)
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 6W (67%)Overall: Claude 3.5 HaikuGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free): 3W (33%)
← Claude 3.5 HaikuGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) →
🏆Claude 3.5 Haiku(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Claude 3.5 HaikuvsGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)
Preference Elo
1,224vs—
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
36.2%vs—
LiveBench
44.8%vs—
GPQA Diamond
54.1%vs—
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 4WGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free): 0W
🏆Claude 3.5 Haiku(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Claude 3.5 HaikuvsGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)
Output speed
140 tok/svs—
Time to first token
110 msvs—
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 2WGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free): 0W
🏆Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Claude 3.5 HaikuvsGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)
Output price
$4/1Mvs$0/1M+$4/1M
Input price
$0.8/1Mvs$0/1M+$0.8/1M
Context window
200kvs262k+62k
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 0WGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free): 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo
Claude 3.5 Haiku1,224
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
LiveBench
Claude 3.5 Haiku44.8%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
SWE-bench
Claude 3.5 Haiku36.2%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
GPQA Diamond
Claude 3.5 Haiku54.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
Time to first token
Claude 3.5 Haiku110 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
Output speed
Claude 3.5 Haiku140 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
Input price+$0.8/1M
Claude 3.5 Haiku$0.8/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)$0/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Output price+$4/1M
Claude 3.5 Haiku$4/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)$0/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Context window+62k
Claude 3.5 Haiku200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)262k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,224
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
LiveBench
44.8%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
SWE-bench
36.2%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
54.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Time to first token
110 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Output speed
140 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Input price
$0.8/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$0.8/1M
Output price
$4/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$4/1M
Context window
200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
262k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+62k

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free):Pick Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)

Lower output list price ($0/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)

Larger window (262k).

Screenshots / visionClaude 3.5 Haiku

Claude 3.5 Haiku is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)Lower output list price ($0/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)Larger window (262k).
Screenshots / visionClaude 3.5 HaikuClaude 3.5 Haiku is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-3-5-haiku-vs-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it-free/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Elo 1,224
SWE-bench36.2%
Speed (tok/s)140 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.8/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$4/1M
Google

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)262k
Input / 1M Tokens$0/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) output tokens are $0/1M versus $4/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) accepts 262k tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude 3.5 Haiku and Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude 3.5 Haiku matchups →|All Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) matchups →
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Claude Haiku 4.5 (next haiku)Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude 3.5 HaikuClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude 3.5 HaikuClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude 3.5 HaikuGemini 3 Pro vs Claude 3.5 HaikuGemini 3 Flash vs Claude 3.5 Haiku